Recycle Your Old
Cell Phones
If you are like most of us, you hate to throw your old cell phones in the trash. The concern is the
sheer numbers of them taking up space and adding
hazardous waste.
On the other hand, you may be reluctant to
drive them around town to a recycling business that may
not dispose of them properly. Some recyclers,
maybe taking them for free, use disposal methods that
are harmful to the environment, so it is a good idea
to refrain from using these businesses.
Now ASO is prepared to collect old cell phones and drop them off at a local recycler that
complies with EPA regulations.
We have two pickup sites: one is at our office
in the Center Mall, first floor, near the west
entrance. Covered parking is available on the 1st level,
accessible from 42nd Street or Center Street. The
phones may simply be pushed through the mail slot if we
are not present.
The second site is at our general meetings on
the second Thursday of each month September
through April, at the Hanscom Park Methodist Church,
4444 Frances Street, 1 block south of 45th & Center. You
are invited to stay and enjoy our fine programs. See
first page, each issue of The Meadowlark, for
complete information about the programs.
Of course, if you wish, you may drop off the phones as well as other items at the recyclers:
Electronic Disposal Technologies, 4815 South 115th Street. There is a small fee per pound, which ASO
will pay if you leave the phones with us.
Electronic Disposal Technologies recycles the
following items as well, which ASO does not handle:
bar coders, circuit boards, copiers, CD/DVD drives,
desktops, DVD players, Fax machines, hand held
devices, keyboards, laptops, modems, monitors, printers,
scanners, and televisions. Call them at 402-733-7297.
To call ASO re drop-off, call Laurine at 451-3647.

Fun at Prairie Festival
By Laurine Blankenau
The 40 or more persons who experienced our Prairie as it
appears on a hot day in late August responded with
almost-equal warmth to the great guided hikes, the refreshing cool drinks
and cookies, and the company of Audubon volunteers and
fellow visitors.
The occasion was Audubon Society of Omaha's first
Prairie Festival held Sunday, August 31.
The 90-degree temps didn't deter three of our members from
conducting hikes nor the numbers of visitors, including some children, who
joined them. Those attending were free to explore the prairie on their own,
but most joined guided tours.
Glenn Pollock introduced hikers to the unique value and
characteristics of prairies. Two birding hikes, pleasingly productive for this time
of year, were led by Clem Klaphake. Eric Scholar, leading a prairie
flower walk, enabled visitors to learn about and enjoy the beauty of the flowers.
We are especially indebted to these Audubon members
who succeeded in making our first
Prairie Festival a success.
¨ Eric Scholar for making the Festival his brainchild and
for leading a prairie flower hike and sharing his wildflower expertise;
¨ Glenn Pollock, who maintains the prairie, for lending
his support of the Festival and sharing his encompassing knowledge
of prairies;
¨ Clem Klaphake for leading bird hikes and sharing his
knowledge about these and other creatures on the prairie.
Assisting with preparations, greeting the visitors and
dispensing the treats were Jackie Scholar, Nelli and Randy Falzgraf, and
Laurine Blankenau. Konney Larwood directed traffic at the
roadside throughout the event.

Assault on the Endangered Species Act
When you see a Bald Eagle or a Whooping Crane winging its way overhead or observe a grizzly bear or
a gray wolf in the wild, you have the Endangered
Species Act to thank that these creatures are still around.
But now the Endangered Species Act (ESA) itself is
endangered.
One of this nation's strongest safeguards against
the extinction of animal and plant species, the ESA
has worked well for over 30 years. It has
successfully protected the Bald Eagle, the gray whale, the grizzly,
as well as Peregrine Falcons and Whooping Cranes. But
for more than a decade, Congressional Republicans
have been trying unsuccessfully to rewrite the
Endangered Species Act. Since that effort failed, the Bush
administration is now attempting to use administrative powers
to make broad changes to the ESA.
The proposed new rules, subject to an unusually
short, 30-day comment period, would give federal agencies
the power to decide whether protected species would
be harmed by agency projects.
For the past 30 years, agencies had to submit
any plans that potentially could affect endangered birds
and animals to an independent review by scientists from
the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service or the National
Marine Fisheries Service.
Under the new proposal, road building, dam
construction, and other federal projects could proceed
immediately if the agency in charge decides that they would
not harm imperiled species. Environmental groups view
with dismay this proposed elimination of an
independent scientific review.
Most federal agencies do not have biologists on
staff, says Bob Irvin of Defenders of Wildlife, so for them
to be making decisions regarding how their projects
will affect birds and animals, is "clearly a case of the
fox guarding the chicken coop." The National
Audubon Society has asked for an extension of the
comment period and has requested that its activists oppose
the rules changes.
When the Bush Administration was forced in May
to list the polar bear as endangered, Secretary of the
Interior Dick Kempthorne said he would seek changes in
the ESA. According to a Washington Post article,
the Interior Department stated that even if a federal
action such as allowing a power plant would lead to
increased greenhouse gas emissions, the decision would not
trigger a federal review "because it is not possible to link
the emissions to impacts on specific species such as
the polar bear."
In fact, the new rules would prohibit agencies
from assessing emissions from projects that contribute
to global warming and the effect on species and habitats.
Clearly, the proposals by the Bush administration
are a back-door attempt to gut the Endangered Species
Act. The comment period for the rule changes ended
September 15, and the administration would have enough
time to impose the rules before the November election.
A new administration could freeze or reverse the rules,
but that process could take months. It would take
even longer for Congress to overturn the rules with legislation.
Representative Nick Rahall, Chair of the House Resources Committee, said it best in referring to the
new proposals for the Endangered Species Act. "I am
deeply troubled by the proposed rule, which gives
federal agencies an unacceptable degree of discretion to
decide whether or not to comply with the Endangered
Species Act. This is not the type of legacy this Interior
Department should be leaving for future generations."

Certify Your Yard Through
National Wildlife Federation