Numbering Nestboxes
From: "paul kilduff" plkldf"at"hotmail.com
To: BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Cc: plkldf"at"hotmail.com
Subject: Box numbering systems
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:24:24
We have a series of nestboxes, most of them paired, some of
them tripled*.
I need to go to a different numbering system. Starting last
year, I tried to retain the old box numbers, but it has quickly
become confusing as I've added and subtracted locations and
added multiples. I want to include the year the location was
started, so when looking at a table which shows how many fledgings
per year, you have some idea of how long the box has been there.
I want us to be able to tell by looking at the box number if
it is part of a multiple box placing, and which other box(es)
it is multipled with. Without that, email reports are hard to
read. My goal is to make it easy to read tables which record
success/failure, and to make it easy for monitors to read other
monitors' email reports and know which boxes are being talked
about.
My current plan is to re-number all the boxes in this way:
A box which is at a location which was first used in 1993 would
be 93-01. If the box were part of a multiple it would be 93-01-A.
The 01 is arbitrary. All boxes at locations started in '93 would
be 93-01, 93-02, etc., with A, B or C added to designate members
of a multiple.
The setup is such that there are not discrete areas. We have
three trails, but I want to retain the ability to switch boxes
from one trail to the other. Numbering them sequentially has
the drawback of freezing the locations.
What ideas do listmembers have? What's your reaction to my
plan?
*One triple was quite successful. This one was a triangle,
each box 22' from the other. Two had 1-9/16" holes, one
had 1-1/8". I got CACH in the little-holed box, HOWR and
TRES in the others, all at same time. Then changed starling
guard from 1-1/8 to 1-9/16 and got EABL second nesting in that
box!
Paul in Baltimore
From: "Mary Beth Roen" mbroen"at"hotmail.com
To: plkldf"at"hotmail.com, BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Box numbering systems
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 07:51:48
Paul,
You could try putting the stick on numbers that you can get
at any hardware store or Walmart etc. to put on your boxes instead
of permanently writing on the boxes. Then if you move the trail
around, you can just remove the numbers and put new ones on.
That depends, of course, on how many boxes you have, as this
could get a little expensive if you have hundreds of boxes.
Mary Roen, River Falls, WI
From: "paul kilduff" plkldf"at"hotmail.com
Hi, Mary Beth, thank you. We do use the stick-on numbers and
letters -- of course we run out of A's and B's pretty quickly.
The stick-ons are good
because they're durable and easily changeable, though they are
a bit expensive.
I'd still like to hear from people regarding the *system* of
numbering, as opposed to the method -- what do you do? What
system do you use to number your boxes?
best, Paul
From: "Mary Beth Roen" mbroen"at"hotmail.com
Paul,
I only have 27 nest boxes, so I don't have the problem you
have. Up to this year I have had all my boxes placed singly,
but I am pairing my boxes for next year due to competition from
TRESs and HOWRs.
I may renumber my boxes, too. I think I will number them by
site and A and B for boxes at each site, so I will have site
1, box A and site 1 Box B, like
you are. I think this is a terrific idea, and it will also make
it easier to remember where each pair is. Your system is great
and gives a lot of information just by the name. I can't think
of any way to improve it. Thanks for the idea!
Mary Roen, River Falls, WI
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:01:40 -0700
From: Linda Violett lviolett"at"earthlink.net
To: plkldf"at"hotmail.com
CC: BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Box numbering systems
Paul, your sites, like many of mine, change from year to year
and/or the configurations do not stay the same. On large dynamic
trails, numbers on the boxes quickly become obsolete and ID
is really for "worksheet/data" use. Therefore, you
may want to do as I have done and omit numbers on the boxes
altogether and set up a workable hard copy system for the trail
monitor and a computerized system for sharing, analyzing.
Hard copies for the trail monitor:
I use two three-ring binders for each separate geographic trail
with a yearly monitor sheet for each box. The sheets are in
contiguous order (or pod group) according to their physical
location on the trail. Two binders are kept so that the monitor
has a historical binder and an updated monitoring binder which
holds the current year. Site and box ID has its own yearly monitor
sheet such as: Green Park at Grand Blvd. next to water fountain,
NABS style box. At some time during or after the year, mark
each sheet with a yellow highlighter for successes and an orange
highlighter for problems. In the current binder, it is helpful
to retain the previous year's sheet facing the current monitor
sheet. When the monitor opens to binder to update the log sheet,
an instant reminder of last year's problems can easily be seen
because of the orange highlighting. Later, if a box needs to
be removed, the sheet in the physical binder is marked with
a red-line slash with the reason for removal. If a box needs
to be added, a new sheet is inserted into the binder where applicable.
Electronic Data for Sharing, Analyzing:
This is the time-consuming part of record-keeping. As you indicated,
it can become very confusing as new boxes are added or omitted
to various locations. As most Bluebird-L members are aware,
I'm keeping detailed online log notes of urban box locations
which were abandoned by previous monitors because of high-intensity
HOSP problems. If successful, these notes may help other monitors
at some future date. Some sites which started out with a single
box became 5-box clusters this year. Next year's changes will
be similar. Therefore, online (sharing) notes of clustered sites
are being reconfigured into tables to highlight the interactions
within the clustered boxes. The online notes are not yet complete
but a good example for the pod concept of record-keeping can
be seen at
http://home.earthlink.net/~lviolett/testmirada.html ). Scroll
down to La Mirada-Pastrana/Alicante Nestbox cluster of 2003
notes.
The year of a new site doesn't seem to carry much relevance
to my data.
The interaction/competition within the pod of boxes (or between
contiguous boxes) seems to be very important. If you scroll
to the pod site provided above, you will see that Bluebirds
seem to be moving from box to box within the 5-box cluster as
if they are trying to avoid confrontation with House Sparrows
by moving to vacant boxes . . . and HOSP seem to be specifically
tailing the Bluebirds' movements.
If you are going to analyze data on a spreadsheet according
to site numbers, you will need to assign a number to each site,
behind the site number should be a box ID and the number of
the box(es) within the pod; behind that you could add the year
if that is important to you. !
Linda Violett - Yorba Linda, Calif.
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:47:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Box numbering systems
From: "Haleya Priest" mablue"at"gis.net
To: plkldf"at"hotmail.com, BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
CC: plkldf"at"hotmail.com
I don't know if this will help, but I made sure when I put up
my trail that I started off skipping a few numbers in between
each box. That way if I added boxes, I'd still be able to have
the numbers congruent with the rest of the trail.
Where I have double or triple paired boxes, I use the number
of the box, say 58, and then the second box would be 58-1 and
if it has triple boxes,
the third box would be 58-2. Therefore when I look at my records
I know that those are paired or tripled boxes right away.
The stick on numbers sound interesting. But I also have a lot
of boxes and I am still waiting to find thin clear or white
plastic that I can mark the box numbers onto and then staple
the plastic to the box. They would be easy to take off if I
move the box.
Be careful about using letters for box numbers. I don't know
if it is still true, but it used to be that either NABS or Cornell's
data banks would not take letters - only numbers. I think that
was the old NABS system - not sure now.
I sure know one thing- I'd be completely lost with out numbering
my boxes!!! It is much easier to remember a number rather than
the box location as a marker to quickly locate a box in my monitor
sheets.
This is one of the wonderful things about this list - is learning
how many different styles there are when it comes to bluebirding.
I also wonder what Wendell's style of numbering his boxes are.
I am sure we'd get a hoot out of his answer to this question
:-)
Good luck Paul - let us know what you decide. Honestly I don't
think there is such a thing as anal retentive in this line of
work. It is called trying to keep some semblance of sanity when
out on the trail - as without being organized things can get
crazy quickly! :-) H
Haleya Priest Amherst MA
From: "Bruce Burdett" blueburd"at"tds.net
To: mbroen"at"hotmail.com, plkldf"at"hotmail.com, BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Box numbering systems
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:49:01 -0400
To the Constituency,
I don't use either numbers or letters to identify my (72) boxes,
and I put nothing on the boxes themselves. I use the names of
the people who own the land where my boxes are located.
Example: Eldredge 1 and Eldredge 2. The # 1 is always the one
on the left as I approach from the car. # 2 is on the right.
Every site has one pair of boxes spaced 15 feet apart.
I have printed up a checklist of all "my" landowners,
and make notes on the list as I monitor. If there are two pairs
at one site, I simply call them, for example: Dobles East 1,
Dobles East 2, Dobles West 1 and 2, etc.
That seems to be all the identification I need. Numbering the
boxes would only confuse me because I was never very good at
maths.
Bruce Burdett, SW NH
From: "charlene anchor" charleneanchor"at"msn.com
To: Bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re box numbering
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:11:26 -0500
This discussion comes at a good time for me since I haven't
started a numbering system yet as I'm still putting up the boxes.
But the old boxes Iam taking down used a method I think which
is very durable and probably were on the boxes for many years.
Pieces of very thin aluminum foil (notthe cooking type) were
stapled on the sides of the boxes under the overhanging roofs.
The numbers of the boxes were impressed into the foil (with
a pen or pencil?). The nice thing is that the weather doesn't
affect the foil and the foil pieces can be easily removed. One
possible drawbackis that it doesn't stand out clearly at a distance
as well as paint or pressed on letters, if that would be a consideration.
Since I haven't started my system yet I don't know how difficult
it is to impress the foil but I wouldn't think it would be hard
as long as a sharp tool is not used.
Charlene Anchor, Illinois
From: "Fawzi P. Emad femad <at> fpemad <dot> com
To: plkldf"at"hotmail.com, BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Box numbering systems
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:39:16 -0400
My numbering system is quite simple: No marking on any boxes.
Each trail is monitored always from the same starting point
and in the same direction. The boxes are taken in sequence as
I come to them one by one. For example, Rachel Carson Conservation
Park, I start with box #1 (the number is found *only* on my
monitoring sheet for that box.) Naturally, the next box is #2,
etc. If I change sites or boxes, I note the changes, and I continue
to use
the same numbering system. I know this method will not work
for many, especially if you want to keep track of older boxes
in view of changes made from season to season... But in my case(s)
the trails are stable and rarely change from year to year. Also,
on top of the monitoring sheet I have a short notation like
(Box #3, pine, front-open, backyard 20023.) This example is
for a "neighborhood" box, the address is 20023 on
our road.
Fawzi Emad in Laytonsville, Maryland
femad"AT"comcast.net
From: "Dan Hanan" danhan7"at"earthlink.net
To: BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Box numbering systems
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:51:43 -0500
Paul Kilduff and others,
Paul, your numbering system looks good to me. As you have more
than one trail, you might want to add a trail number to your
system.
As I have 24 boxes on my own 40 acres of land and have no need
to pair boxes, I number the boxes sequentially. For convenience
in monitoring, they are numbered in the order that I walk the
trail. If boxes are added, deleted, or moved between nesting
seasons, the numbers are then changed to be consecutive and
in "trail order." The numbers are on 2 inch by 2 inch
wood blocks that have a single mounting screw hole in them.
Thus all of the numbers can be removed and rearranged easily.
The numbers have been burned into the wood blocks with a small
electronic soldering iron (the size of a wood burning tool)
and then emphasized by the use of a permanent black marker.
My monitoring records are kept in an Excel spreadsheet where
the kind of box, mounting pole, box dimensions, and previous
years location numbers are also listed. This supplemental information
is kept in a suppressed form that is not seen when entering
monitoring results but is there to be readily recalled if needed.
Dan Hanan
35 miles SE of Austin, TX
From: Nahanna2"at"aol.com [mailto:Nahanna2"at"aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 4:29 PM
Subject: ideas for Marking Boxes?
Hello Wise Blue Birders! I am in the process of adding 30+ boxes for my trail. I received a donation from a foundation for boxes! I am looking to mark the boxes, number them, and put a bit of information on them. and I need some ideas? That is methods of doing this? I thought to paint stencil numbering on them, but there may better ways? Ideas? Thank you! Nancy California Bluebird Recovery Program Walnut Creek, Ca 94598
From: Dottie Roseboom [mailto:rosedot"at"mtco.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 4:55 PM
Re: ideas for Marking Boxes?
Way to go Nancy! I hope that everyone answers this on-line, because I have a friend who needs similar advice. Several years ago, I discovered a trail that need some monitoring - but there were no identifying names or phone numbers for me to contact. Very disappointing, especially since the adjoining neighbors did not know anything about the nestboxes. Dottie Roseboom Peoria IL (central - zone 5)
From: Gretchen Hughes [mailto:lghughes"at"
joink.com
]
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: ideas for Marking Boxes? From: "Gretchen Hughes" Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 6:41 PM Subject: Re: ideas for Marking Boxes?
..Loren uses the plastic numbers that stick on to number the boxes. A black marker works well to , altho the rain may fade it fast. I make labels and laminate them for him to staple to the front of the box with name address phone# and e-mail address on them. They last for quite a while. There are places to have plastic labels made to do the same thing. I hope this gives you ideas. Making them on the computer, using address labels and a laminator at Wal-Mart is only $20,, makes the job a lot cheaper. GHughes Loren and Gretchen Hughes
From: Dottie Roseboom [mailto:rosedot"at"mtco.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 8:26 PM
Subject: Fw: ideas for Marking Boxes?
Thanks Gretchen! I didn't know if laminated labels would last outside. I had thought about using polyurethane as a "decoupage" technique over labels. Years ago, my college roommate did many wood products this way. They weathered well. A bit cheaper than the laminator - but not as easy :-) And of course a stapled label would be easier to change than one decoupaged. I'll look next time I'm at Wal-Mart. I don't think that either the polyurethane or laminate plastic would create any problems if done early in the fall. My friend picked up some small numbers at a garage sale. She didn't want anything too obtrusive. Dottie Roseboom Peoria IL (central - zone 5)
|