Click to go to Audubon Society of Omaha Home Page Audubon Society of OmahaEastern Bluebird

Welcome to The Bluebird Box since 1995
Best of Bluebird Mailing Lists Classified

Insects and Mites and Lice in the Nestbox (including use of insecticides inside nestboxes)

Also see posts on Insecticides and Anting

In addition to Messages that have appeared in the Bluebird Mailing Lists on this topic, the following are on the Audubon Society of Omaha website:  Predators and Problems On The Bluebird Trail


Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 12:10:35 -0500
From: "Bill Darnell" bdarnell"at"centurytel.net
To: springer"at"alltel.net, "BLUEBIRD-L" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu, kridler"at"1starnet.com
Cc: "Gary Springer" springer"at"alltel.net
Subject: Re: Low temps-eggs/tent caterpillars

Gary:

I have had a lot of luck using bacillus thurengensis (SIC?) on tent caterpillars. Not harmful to anything but worms.

...
Also, do starlings eat tent caterpillars? I've heard the Yellow billed
Cuckoo is one of the only birds that will eat fuzzy caterpillars. I saw a
Tufted titmouse tear these apart but it didn't seem like it actually ate any
of the caterpillar.

...


Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 16:25:46 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Zbiciak" nzbiciak"at"gfn.org
To: "'BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu'" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: RE: Low temps-eggs/tent caterpillars

The tent caterpillars here are usually from the gypsy moth.

Whenever one pops up, I immediately cut the branch off and burn the entire nest. They are causing great harm to the hardwoods in Michigan. I've seen them in cherry, peach, and oak. From what I've observed, it's not worth the damage to the trees, for the birds barely put a dent in their population.

Nicholas
Holly, Michigan
42nd Parallel

...


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 08:46:15 -0400
From: "Bruce Burdett" blueburd"at"srnet.com
To: BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: T.C/G.M

My understanding is that 'Tent Caterpillars' and 'Gypsy Moths' are NOT the same thing, as has been implied here. Gypsy Moths (Lymantria dispar), another European import, do not make 'tents'. The larvae spread out widely in the branches (hence 'Gypsy', and 'dispar', probably) and strip the leaves from entire trees and neighborhoods, finally pupating and hatching the moths on the tree-trunks. Tent Caterpillars, (genus: Malacosoma) often called Fall Webworms around here, spend their larval stage in those tight clusters we call 'tents', and don't move very far from them.

Unfortunately for us humans, most birds do not care much for either of them. Cuckoos are an exception, and where we are the Cuckoos have a way of showing up whenever we have a severe Gypsy Moth infestation. (I have seen the entire outer walls of suburban houses completely covered with billions of the hairy larvae, who are searching vainly for leaves to eat.) In normal times we don't see the Cuckoos much.

Bruce Burdett, NH Bluebird Conspiracy, Sunapee NH, where I've seen no sign of Bluebird nesting yet, and no Tree Swallows. Still pretty raw and wintry here, with a scattering of snow yesterday, and about 5 days of intermittent (sp?) rain. ("Intermittant" looks pretty awful.)
blueburd"at"srnet.com


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:31:00 -0400
From: "Bruce Burdett" blueburd"at"srnet.com
To: BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Aggressive?

In answer to Nicholas' question: " Can I be too aggressive in burning and destroying Tent Caterpillar nests?", I'd say, simply, "No". But it seems to me that the task of burning and destroying A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER of them is pretty gargantuan, and maybe futile, like trying to kill all the ants, or all the mosquitoes. Maybe you could make a significant difference IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, or IN YOUR YARD.

Fortunately for us, these heavy infestations of TC and GM are subject to 'crashing'. One year in Connecticut, at the very height of the most severe Gypsy Moth infestations in decades, when there was hardly a leaf visible as far as one could see in any direction, every caterpillar simply died, overnight, apparently. They were all dead one morning, and there had been NO spraying. (-though some had been contemplated, of course.) I've read that they fall prey to some galloping contagion, perhaps a mite, or a virus. Some speculated that they had died of starvation, naturally, but even the ones which had found some isolated patch of remaining vegetation died where they stood, in the very act of munching a leaf.

Interestingly, the completely stripped trees, oaks mostly where we were, put out an entire new 'suit' of full-sized leaves before the summer was over. But arborists said that this 'double-leafing' process leaves some trees so weakened that they die the following winter or spring.

Bruce Burdett, NHBC blueburd"at"srnet.com
P.S.: For what it may be worth, some say that calling the Tent Caterpillar the Fall Webworm is a misnomer, and that, properly speaking, the Webworm is a separate species, 'Hyphantria cunea'.


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:09:44 -0400
From: "Randy Jones" randyj"at"enter.net
To: nzbiciak"at"gfn.org
Cc: "Bluebird Listserve" bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: T.C/G.M

I was very worried about tent caterpillars when we had a strong infestation a couple of years ago, so I called the county agent. He told me not to worry about it, that although they did not particularly look good, they did not harm the trees seriously. Gypsy moths are another story, of course.

Randy Jones
Allentown PA

...


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:17:39 -0400
From: "Gary Springer" springer"at"alltel.net
To: "BLUEBIRD-L" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu, blueburd"at"srnet.com
Cc: "Gary Springer" springer"at"alltel.net
Subject: Gypsy moths mysterious death

...

Dear Bruce,

First of all, did the tent caterpillars AND gypsy moths die simultaneously?, or wouldn't you recall?

After reading your description of how mysteriously the Gypsy Moths in your area died, I suspect they were sprayed with something. I believe they are commonly sprayed in many areas. I've been told that here in Georgia when they find a local infestation, they spray that area as well as a radius of so far around it.

The financial impact is huge and to expedite things and to keep down the roar, they probably just went ahead and sprayed. It would cost less time and money to spray than to debate it. It wouldn't have to be done like low altitude crop spraying. You wouldn't even know it was done.

Considering the billions of dollars in financial impact, can you even suspect that if the moths just up and died they wouldn't have performed sufficient scientific analysis to figure out if a mite or virus killed them? Or, do you think they would let a debate rage on while the trees died and thousands of millions of dollars were lost while they had a simple solution at their finger tips? I don't think so.

I admit I'm guessing on this. But I also think they would cover up such a spraying even afterwards to prevent public outcry and the possible elimination of an effective solution when the next infestation occurs. I doubt anyone's complaining or investigating now that the moths are finally gone.

If you are aware of what type of spray would be used, please write.

Gary

PS These Gypsy moths are such a huge problem, despite my strong feelings against the use of pesticides, I'm not even sure which side of the spraying debate I'd fall on. This MAY be one example when the risk of using the pesticide is outweighed by the ultimate outcome if nothing is done. We might be talking about the prevention of loss of all of our mature deciduous forests and many other species that depend on them, not just the loss of a few nesting cavities.


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:35:36 -0400
From: "Bruce Burdett" blueburd"at"srnet.com
To: springer"at"alltel.net
Cc: BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Spray?

To: Gary Springer, et al,

All I can say, relative to that mass die-off of Gypsy Moth caterpillars in Conn. back in the '80s, none of us in that area ever saw, heard, heard of, or smelled any evidence of spraying. If it was done, it must have been done with diabolical, indeed, superhuman secrecy and stealth. There was talk about the possibility, of course, and lots of debate about the pros and cons. There were some small, scattered, isolated, well-publicized spray-hits here and there around the state, but the public sentiment against spraying in our area was so strong that I really don't believe it ever happened. Our area was predominantly residential, and people were concerned chiefly about the family health hazards involved with spraying.  As I said, I READ, back then, about the mite/virus theory, but I certainly don't have any hard information about it. I wonder if any Listers do.

And in response to another Lister's query: No. The Tent Caterpillar/Webworm population was not affected by this die-off. Only the Gypsy Moth caterpillars bought the farm.

Bruce Burdett, NHBC


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 14:39:38 -0500
From: "Fread Loane" firefrost2"at"earthlink.net
To: "BLUEBIRD-L" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Gypsy Moth Pathogens

There are two naturally occuring pathogens which are affecting some control on the Gypsy Moth. The first naturally occuring pathogen is the viral disease Nucleopolyhedrosis. However, the one which seems to hold the most promise is the Entomophthoralean Fungus. This is a host specific fungus which attacks the Gypsy Moth.

Originally released in the early 1900's in North America, E. maimaiga was first thought a failure. In 1989 E. maimaiga was found to be creating vast epizootics in several New England states. In 1992 this fungus had now been spread throughout the entire Gypsy Moth's range. Since that time, scientists are studying these epizootics to determine how E. maimaiga will effect the long term population dynamics of the Gypsy Moth. The fungus was brought from Japan if I recall correctly.

Fread J. Loane
Tulsa, Oklahoma


Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 19:25:15 -0400
From: Lynn Emerich lemerich"at"epix.net
To: springer"at"alltel.net
Cc: BLUEBIRD-L BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu, blueburd"at"srnet.com
Subject: Re: Gypsy moths mysterious death

Gary, Here in PA, we have intermittent attacks of both Webworm and Gypsy moth. If memory serves, Webworm is in spring and Gypsy moth later. Both construct nest that appear web like.

They have sprayed here twice in twenty years and it really does work. They use BT, don't remember the full name, but it does not harm anything but caterpillars - most any type. I bought some at my local farm supply store for use on my own trees. Here it seems the hit all the cherry trees first, both wild and tame.

Next is any other fruit tree, then anything that's left.

Lynn near Reading Pa

...


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 19:04:00 -0400
From: "Gary Springer" springer"at"alltel.net
To: "Fread Loane" firefrost2"at"earthlink.net
Cc: "Gary Springer" springer"at"alltel.net,"BLUEBIRD-L" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Gypsy Moth Pathogens

Dear Fread,

In your opinion, do the pathogens you described work in such a manner that they could be ineffective as the Gypsy Moth population exploded, then , suddenly kill all the larvae of the Gypsy Moth in the narrow time frame that has been described as "over night" in such a wide and heavily infested area?

Gary

----- Original Message -----

From: Fread Loane
To: BLUEBIRD-L
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 3:39 PM
Subject: Gypsy Moth Pathogens

...


Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 19:53:41 -0500
From: "Fread Loane" firefrost2"at"earthlink.net
To: "BLUEBIRD-L" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Gypsy Moth Epizootics

Both viral and fungal infection are natural occurences in the Gypsy Moth population. Infection generally is transfered when the caterpillar eats foliage contaminated with either fungal spores or viral occlusion bodies. The viral pathogen invades through the gut wall, reproducing rapidly in the internal tissues causing organ failure. Eventually the host caterpillar will rupture distributing viral occlusion bodies into the environment which serve to infect other Gypsy Moth caterpillars.

Both viral and fungal pathogens can remain at low, inactive levels and cause little mortality in low density populations of Gypsy Moths. When Gypsy Moth populations increase to a certain level, massive reproduction of the viral agent occurs resulting in very high levels of mortality (an epizootic). This is the most common cause of sudden collapse of high density Gypsy Moth populations. Such a collapse could appear to have occured overnight, however, it had been building for a number of weeks.

Fread J. Loane
Tulsa, Oklahoma


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:36:41 -0400
From: Barb DeLong delong24"at"msu.edu
To: Bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Japanese Beetles

Does anyone on the list know how to get rid of Japanese Beetles on my flowers and cactus and yet not be harmful to all of my birds? The cactus is in a rock garden around the bluebird house and I've got 8 day old babies in there.

I've been told Diazinon is harmful to the birds.

Thanks!
Barb DeLong
Eaton Rapids, Michigan


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:47:53 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Zbiciak" nzbiciak"at"gfn.org
To: "'delong24"at"msu.edu'" delong24"at"msu.edu,"Bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu"Bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: RE: Japanese Beetles

There has been some talk out here about soaking tobacco and spraying the plants with the juice. I am planning to try it but haven't yet. My egg plant vines are looking like someone used them to punch out confetti, but all five of my baby blues fledged.

Nicholas
Holly, Michigan

p.s. How do you get cactus to grow in Michigan?

...


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:17:45 EDT
From: MSBOC"at"aol.com
To: delong24"at"msu.edu, Bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Japanese Beetles

There is a product called BioNeem. It is organic, and expensive. It's supposed to be safe. I used it for two or three years. However, this year I had so many grubs that my lawn was almost destroyed. You could pull the grass up with your hands like a carpet. I ended up having to use grub control, which is toxic, on my lawn. Fortunately, they applied the stuff and within an hour we had a day of rain which washed the chemical into the lawn. They also did not apply it near my bluebird houses...But who knows? The lawn man I use told me NEVER to use the Japanese Beetle traps. He said that only brought more and more beetles to your property.

Hope this is helpful.
Nancy
Newtown, CT


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:42:17 -0400
From: Bill & Dot Forrester wforres1"at"twcny.rr.com
To: bluebird-l bluebird-l"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Japanese Beetles

I too have heard the tobacco juice idea, but nicotine is poisonous. Our birds feed on insects on poisoned plants, especially when babies are still young and need soft insects to eat. I would NEVER forgive myself if I deliberately poisoned the birds in my boxes. Handing-picking is the only safe method of control. It's semi-disgusting, but quick and easy (beetles don't bite or sting), and most of all it's safe for birds. I pick them into a little jar of soapy water (soap keeps them from crawling out and escaping) and am careful not to be near the nestbox for more than 10 mins. at a time, as I don't want to prevent parents from bringing in food. Midmorning is the best time, when sun is on the plants and beetles are actively mating. If you wait till afternoon, female beetles will have already laid their eggs in your lawn.

Dot

"Nicholas A. Zbiciak" wrote:

There has been some talk out here about soaking tobacco and spraying the
plants with the juice.


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:54:36 -0400
From: "Karen Deeds-Jarvie" deeds"at"bghost.net
To: delong24"at"msu.edu, Bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Japanese Beetles

Barb et all,

Rodale always used to say that the most natural way to get rid of pests like beetles is to gather up a bunch, blend them in a blender with enough water to make a nice spray, and spray your garden with it. They are supposed to leave any place that has their own dead on it. Should be easy to check out
in any Rodale gardening book.

Karen :-)
B.G., Ohio
...


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:09:04 -0400
From: "Randy Jones" randyj"at"enter.net
To: delong24"at"msu.edu
Cc: "Bluebird Listserve" bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Japanese Beetles

Nine years ago, I put down milky spore powder in a pattern as prescribed, making a grid of 3-foot squares over my entire property and that of my neighbor. We see an occasional Japanese beetle now, but hardly any. The milky spores when they get wet, become a "disease" which infects any grub of the Japanese beetle (and some others, I believe), so that they, too, become "disease" factories. The spore disease gradually spreads from the 3-foot grid until the entire area is "infected" and killing any grubs which hatch out on your property. Of course, they will fly in from nearby and lay their eggs, but they are killed before they do any damage.

I am not a biologist, but I believe the disease is harmful only to the grubs in the ground, which do not emerge and therefore do not become food for
birds.

After nine years, we still have the problem under control, and I have read that the milky spores remain active in the soil for 20 years or more.

You can probably get the powder at a garden store. It is expensive, though. I think I paid $100 for 10 pounds nearly ten years ago, but it was worth it.
You do it only once.

Randy Jones
Allentown PA
randyj"at"enter.net

...


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:07:33 -0500
From: "Fread Loane" firefrost2"at"earthlink.net
To: "BLUEBIRD-L" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Newest Approach For Grub Control

There have been several posts about safe and effective control of various grubs (larval stages of beetles). The use of insecticides to control these insects often will cause dying grubs to come to the surface where they can be ingested by birds. There are other methods and alternative treatments to control these insects which does not cause harm to the environment.

Below are three URLs listed which offer alternative treatments:
http://www.buglogical.com/
http://www.buglogical.com/nematodes.shtml
http://www.biconet.com/biocontrol/bpopillae.html 

Essentially what you would be doing using either of these treatments would be to innoculate your soil with either nematodes (tiny microscopic worms which are host-specific to beetle larvae) or using a baccillus (in this case Baccillus popillae, which is also host-specific to beetle larvae). Oftentimes, because of re-infestation from 360 degrees around you, these treatments can be a one-time treatment. In both cases, both the baccillus and the nematode must have access to grubs to keep their populations built up in the soil to remain effective.

I have personally used Baccillus popillae to control several forms of Chafer Beetles and found it to be still effective after seven years from the first treatment of my garden and lawns. Because you are dealing with live organisms, you must follow the manufacturer's directions to properly innoculate your soil. Do not expect instant control! The nematodes and baccillus have to build their populations in your soil to become effective.

I hope this will offer a different choice to those who wish not to use insecticides.

Fread J. Loane
Tulsa, Oklahoma


Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:15:57 -0400
From: "D.H. Snook 40:53N 81:35W Canal Fulton, OH (NE)" dhsnook"at"sssnet.com
To: deeds"at"bghost.net, BLUEBIRD-L BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Japanese Beetles

The Organic Gardening magazine, many years ago, had this solution about blending bugs to keep like bugs out of gardens, etc. I never tried it becaus my wife would not let me use the blender!

If this works, it might be a revolutionary way to control House Sparrows. Please let us know.
Doug Snook

...


Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:29:52 -0400
From: Barb DeLong delong24"at"msu.edu
To: dhsnook"at"sssnet.com, deeds"at"bghost.net, BLUEBIRD-L BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Japanese Beetles

I like your wife - will not try the blender effect - thank you all for your suggestions! Didn't see too many of them on my flowers yesterday, but will look over the the suggestions and decide from there.

Thanks!
Barb DeLong
Eaton Rapids, Michigan

...


Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniel Sparks dansparks_47448"at"yahoo.com
To: bluebird-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Insect identification

I recently opened a nest box to find a dead ten day old bluebird nestling covered with beetle-like insects. They were about the size of a half of a dime, black with a yellow spot on the back of the head and shoulder area with a black area in the middle of the yellow spot. They are obviously attracted to decaying matter. Does anyone know what this insect is??

Dan Sparks
Brown County Bluebird Society
Nashville, IN


Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:31:47 -0400
From: "Ruth Edwards" pinecrestfarm"at"earthlink.net
To: "Bluebird" BLUEBIRD-L"at"CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re Insect I.D.

To Dan and all, The beetles you found on the dead nestling are carrion beetles. Sometimes also called burying beetles. They are a part of nature's clean-up crew, similar to the vultures. They had nothing to do with the demise of the nestling but are there to clear away the dead which will be recycled to their own young. Nature is not always beautiful but is always truly fascinating!

Ruth Edwards. Westport, MA


Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:42:52 -0500
From: "Fread Loane" firefrost2"at"earthlink.net
To: "BLUEBIRD-L" BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Beetle Indentification

Dan Sparks et al

The beetle which you aptly described is the American Carrion Beetle (Necrophila americana). This particular carrion beetle is used in forensic entomology to help determine the likely time of death, as it metamorphoses through a distinct set of growth patterns.

The beetle was an "after the act" benneficial only recycling the dead bird. I have attached a URL to show two of the most common forms of this beetle:
http://www.forensic-entomology.com/beetleadults.htm 

Fread J. Loane
Tulsa, Oklahoma


Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:19:10 -0600
From: Haleya Priest
Subject: Bug Question

Haleya Priest Amherst MA

One of my up and coming bluebird buddies here has a question about bugs. She went to monitor (don't you love it when you can convince someone to monitor!!!!) her Gilbertson with TRES, her arms were covered with what she describes as " a zillion little black bugs as small as specks of dust. Miniscule (sp)." Now, these are only on the outside of the box so far and the TRES all look fine. But we are both curious as to WHAT these are, and if she ought to be concerned. Another thing is that there are about "25 TRES" all hanging around the box/in the air. I just assume that these are all the other TRES that are all done nesting and are just hanging around waiting for these late nesters to finish up. No way are they bored. Just lots of them.
Thanks for your thoughts. H :-)


Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 22:05:51 -0500
From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler"
Subject: RE:bug question

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
Do these tiny "bugs" have wings? (Mites don't!) They sound very much like a mite infestation to me but the color is not quite right! Many of the mites are almost clear while some go to a bright red that you will find in nestboxes from time to time. If they are mites you will see them around the eyes of the baby birds if they already are feathered out. Mites like to congregate around the entrance hole or in cracks between the roof and sides of the box. They do not like direct sunlight so will normally be on the shady side of the box.

RE:dead baby birds: Can you identify the species of ant? This late in the year a nestbox placed in full sun can become too hot for newborn baby birds. If your temperatures were in the mid 90's then this might be the killer and the ants (depending on species) might only be guilty of cleaning up the nest. I believe the insect you are describing is an earwig. (wild guess!) If ants are getting to the box then it should be placed on a metal pole and use grease to keep them from climbing up to the box. Is your box mounted on a wood pole or tree? These are often preferred feeding areas for ants. It is not unusual to lose birds when we are just getting started in placing boxes. Describe your situation a little more and we can help you place the box in the best location. KK


From: "BONNIE A. YEAGER" dement"at"frognet.net
Subject: Beetle Larvae
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:00:34 -0500

Has anyone in Ohio observed bluebirds eating a rather large (~1 inch) white larvae in the spring of the year? These larvae are much bigger than a Japanese beetle larvae. The bluebirds typically beat the larvae to death on the top of fence post prior to eating them. I am sure these larvae are Very high in fat content and are a Great food source for getting the birds into top form for the breeding season. I have observed bluebirds eating these larvae for several years and would like to know what the adult form (beetle) of this larvae is. Can anyone help?

Thank you,
Fred Yeager,
SE, OH


Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 21:15:25 -0600
From: Su Mrozinski myotis"at"mhtc.net
Subject: OT: RE Beetle Larvae

I'm in Wisconsin but I'll bet those big grubs are brown June bugs/beetles. I dig up plenty every year and toss 'em to the robins. There's a neat article with perfect descriptions of both grub and bug at http://newton.dep.anl.gov/natbltn/100-199/nb121.htm from the archives (1947) of the Cook County Forest Preserve (Illinois, my home state and county!).

----
Su
Mineral Point WI


From: "Fread J" firefrost2"at"hotmail.com
Subject: Beetle Larvae: Possible ID
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 00:31:05 -0600

Fread Loane, Tulsa, OK

The beetle larvae which was being softened by pounding against a wooden post by a bluebird was possibly the larval form of the Masked Chafer beetle, more commonly known as "the June Bug". The adult form is generally between one-quarter to one-half inch in length, is reddish-brown in color, has a hard shell (carapace) and is quite rotund (nice way of saying he is "fat").  They commonly gather at a yard/porch light on a late Spring evening (hence the common name "June Bug").

The larval form is a thick, curled white grub known for its capacity to turn turf grasses brown when they munch away at the roots.

While most nursery staff will steer you to some of the broad spectrum insecticides that kill indiscriminately, I would rather see your approach to remove these larval beetle forms from your turf areas by using beneficial nematodes. These are microscopic tiny worms which attack larval forms found in the soil. Once your soil is inoculated properly, the nematode population will stabilize and should provide satisfactory control for years to come.

'Fisher people' on this list will recall finding these grubs under hay or manure piles where they were collected and used as an excellent tough bait for Channel Catfish!

The biological-biorational control that I would recommend is not commercially available at present. Essentially it is a new found strain of  "milky spore disease" caused by entomophathogenic nematodes, the natural enemy of white grubs. Watch for new press releases on this product (Yet to be named).

The beneficial entomophathogenic nematode that I would strongly recommend is Heterohabditis 'bacteriophora' as it has consistently shown good activity against white grubs. It is found in the commercially available product of  "CRUISER".

A second biological-biorational control that is available is the synthesized hormone "ecdysone". This hormone controls the molting cycles of white grubs. Using this synthetic hormone triggers the untimely response of molting and results in death of the grub. Look for the product name of  "MACH 2" (halofenozide) as it has shown consistent and excellent control over a number of white grub species.

Fread J. Loane, horticulturist
suffering with computer problems
Tulsa, Oklahoma


From: Michelle Martin [mailto:shell7"at"cox.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: mites on nestling

Michelle Martin
Central Louisiana Hey , was wondering if anyone had a photo of mites ?  I do believe one of my four out of five that did hatch has mites.  It's brownish -red color , and like dots on the one bird.  I can't find a photos so that I'll know for sure .  But I'll give you a link to my pics, one , lightened up alot so that you  could see the dots, but the birds are of natural , and good color, so I'll give tyou the original pic also , so you don't think the birds are not looking right , but they are.  Anyway , this is the first time to see this ever , in five yrs. , so that's why I'm concerned.  And how do I handle this , try to pick up the bird and remove them with something ?  Tweezers maybe ?  What do I do if they are mites ?  Here's the link to the pics: http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=4081223&a=31179404&f = One more thing , I DO need to remove the one egg that did not hatch , am I correct ?


From: MJShearer
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

Hi Michelle,

That looks more like pinfeathers than mites on your nestling, so I wouldn't try to remove them.

You wouldn't want to pluck the poor baby! :-) I'd also wait until the babies are a little older to remove the egg.

MJ

Mary Jane Shearer; Tucker, GA


From: Evelyn Cooper
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 7:14 PM
Subject: RE: mites on nestling

Into my seventh year of monitoring my bluebird trail, I have never had a mite problem. Aren't mites more blackish looking and VERY tiny?

Evelyn Cooper, Delhi,LA


From: Michelle Martin
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

Thanks Ann, for taking a look. I do know what the nestlings look like, but those small brown things throw me. I just don't remember seeing that before now. Guess I jumped the gun, but I'm glad it's not. I'm not talking about the black things protruding from the skin, I know that is feathers. I meant the brown, right in the center of the pic. Maybe I should have drawn an arrow to them. Thank you again !

Michelle Martin

Central Louisiana


From: jwick"at"tds.net
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

Hi Michelle!

Your nestling bluebirds look totally normal to me. Are you seeing something moving on the birds? Have you seen bluebird nestlings before? Normally birds have feather mites, although I've never seen any on bluebirds and I've banded more than 4,000 in the past 6 nesting seasons and young nestlings are featherless.

The little points I could observe from your photos were the locations where the feathers will eventually emerge from beneath the skin. I hope this helps..........

Ann Wick

Black Earth, WI


From: Michelle Martin
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

Thanks Ann, for taking a look. I do know what the nestlings look like, but those small brown things throw me. I just don't remember seeing that before now. Guess I jumped the gun, but I'm glad it's not. I'm not talking about the black things protruding from the skin, I know that is feathers. I meant the brown, right in the center of the pic. Maybe I should have drawn an arrow to them. Thank you again !

Michelle Martin

Central Louisiana


From: Brucemac1"at"aol.com
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

Hello Michelle et al,

I think that it's a little early in the nesting season for mites. I may be mistaken, tho.

When we become concerned about mites and/or blowfly larvae, we'll place a handful of cedar shavings, or pine needles underneath the nest(s). Lift the nests carefully and place the needles or shavings under it. Replace it and that should help.

I've heard others mention that they don't like to use cedar shavings, but I've had good luck with them. I keep my boxes well supplied with cedar shavings as soon as the nesting season is over and thru the winter. Keeps 'em clean, fresh and insect free...!!

Bruce Macdonald, SW Ontario


From: [ mailto:Rappaho"at"aol.com ]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: cedar shavings

In a Message dated 4/4/04 7:22:43 PM, Brucemac1"at"aol.com writes:

I've heard others mention that they don't like to use cedar shavings

For those afraid of the cedar sudt and it harming the lungs of the birds, you can purchase cedar oil. This is usually used to refresh those cedar eggs or other cedar products. You could probably thin with linseed oil or other light non gumming oil and brush on. It is very pungent.

kathy


From: JOHN & BARBARA SIBIO [mailto:jsibio"at"comcast.net ]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 9:53 PM
Subject: mites on nestling

I've been very fortunate over the years; have never had an insect problem. Years ago, someone, and I don't remember who (it's been that long!) suggested using diatomaceous earth to prevent infestations. Has anyone tried this? I was told to clean out the box at the end of the nesting season, and dust it very lightly with diatomaceous earth. To brush some in the cracks and seams so that any bugs hiding there would come in contact with it. I know nothing about it and any effects it might have on the birds, etc. Seems like it would be OK under the nest, but I don't know how effective this stuff is. Anyone with experience???

Barbara in

Cloverdale, CA


From: [mailto:Rappaho"at"aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: diatomaceous earth

In a Message dated 4/4/04 9:00:31 PM, jsibio"at"comcast.net writes:
dust it very lightly with diatomaceous earth

This is a fossilize teeney weeney critter.... powder fine. It will not harm birds or people. It is edible, though I have no idea why one would want to do that. It does kill pantry bugs though.

I do not know if it will kill the mites. Are they hard shelled like fleas and such? If so, then yes.

The thing with diatomaceous earth is that if it gets damp.. it is worthless. Think mud.

kathy.

From: Rappaho"at"aol.com
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

Mite photos and info:

http://medent.usyd.edu.au/fact/birdmite.html

http://www.geocities.com/p_m_s_c_c/mite_infestation.htm


From: Paula [ mailto:PaulaZ"at"columbus.rr.com ]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: Mites on Nestling

Michelle,

Strange that you are only seeing this on one nestling? Others may have different/better advice, but I would not try to pick them off. I would think you would do more damage to bird trying to remove them than the mites are doing and the nest would be absolutely infested with mites also so removing a few would not make much difference I imagine.

My Tree Swallow nests are often absolutely swarming with mites when I remove the nests. They crawl by the millions up my arms and sometimes even further. It is "mitey" disgusting, I can tell you. The bird mites don't bother people, and they won't kill their host usually. Most of my TRES fledge fine - even with all those mites.

Paula Z

Powell (Central) Ohio


From: Paula [ mailto:PaulaZ"at"columbus.rr.com ]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: Mites on Nestling

Evelyn,

The bird mites in my TRES nests are red and VERY tiny and VERY fast.

Paula Z, Powell (Central) Ohio


From: Michelle Martin [mailto:shell7"at"cox.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: Mites on Nestling

Well Paula, if that is the way mites are in behavior, then I bet that's not what it is.  There is nothing on the other birds, or under the nest, pole and so forth.  Thanks for the advice and info ! Michelle Martin
Central Louisiana

From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"tds.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

John & Barbara, Personally, I prefer to clean out my boxes NOT at the end of the season, as you mentioned, but right after every fledging. Usually, by fledging time, my nests are too infested, filthy and beaten down for any self-respecting Bluebird to build on. Bruce Burdett SW NH


From: Kenny Kleinpeter
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:24 AM
Subject:
RE: Mites

I have noticed a few mites in bluebird nests but not many. I wish people would appreciate that mites are beneficial to birds (and humans – you would be aghast if you looked at your bed sheets under a microscope – dust mites are everywhere eating your dead skin!) and that as long as there is not an infestation, they should be left alone. I notice mites in the nestbox as soon as nest construction begins indicating that the adults introduce them. It has been discovered that the common nest mite lays eggs in the bird nest and has a breeding cycle timed to hatch just before the nestlings fledge (makes sense, right?). Conscientious purple martin managers practice nest changes about a week before this “mite bloom” to minimize infestation. Bluebirders should not have the same parasite problems since we deal with individual unit boxes instead of multi-unit apartments where mites seem to spread uncontrollably. In the south, mites are the only possible problem. In the north, blowflies are an additional problem. In that case, the following DE application might be necessary but I think that the nest replacement would be effective and should be tried first.

Diatomaceous Earth (or DE) is not as recommended by responsible bird organizations as it used to be. This powdery substance, the ground-up skeletons of tiny marine animals, has very sharp edges that lacerate the insects, killing them. It was realized that the “almighty EPA” states that if inhaled, DE can cause inflammation of the lungs and irritate the eyes on contact – this is for humans, so a reasonable thinking person could assume the effects would be far worse on a tiny, vulnerable nestling. So, if one does use it, it should be placed under the nest or however it is least likely to become airborne and no more that a teaspoon would be necessary. Furthermore, DE is rendered ineffective when wet (I think it combines).

Like you, Evelyn, I have never seen an unreasonable number of nest mites that would warrant chemical intervention. I would think that a prudent blue birder would simply do a nest replacement if it appeared that mites were infesting a nest. Simply place the nestlings in a covered container (like a cigar box), remove and properly discard the nest (away from the site), take a handful of pine needles (or pine straw for you Yankees) and fashion into a bowl. Oh yes, and don't forget to return the nestlings.

Kenny Kleinpeter. Baton Rouge, LA


From: Don McCartney [mailto:donmc59"at"earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

Hello Bruce, Michelle, Kathy et al,       

Yes, I've heard the arguments of some list members knocking cedar boxes and cedar shavings.  However, until I see the slightest bit of negative evidence in my boxes, I am going to disagree with this.  I line my kestrel boxes with two inches of cedar shavings, and have been doing so for years.  Last year, I fledged 135 kestrels, of which 120 were banded.  Since the AMKE's bring in NO nest material, the nestlings and incubating adults are directly exposed to the cedar shavings.  When the nestboxes are cleaned out, the box remains, complete with bones, insect parts and shavings are sent to a graduate student at the University of Chicago for analysis of the kestrels' diet in various habitats. Out of all the nestings, I have NEVER seen the slightest deleterious effect of the cedar shavings. I use cedar for two reasons:  one is that the cedar shavings available in this area are of a larger size than pine shavings, and thus don't  blow out of the boxes (well-ventilated with 3" entrance holes) in windy areas like the smaller pine shavings tend to do.  Kestrels incubating eggs on a bare wood floor are a recipe for disaster.  The second is the control of pests in the boxes.   I consulted with a professional avian toxicologist who gave me his unhedged recommendation          that I use cedar shavings to derive the possible benefit of control of  nestbox parasites that may be present. This seems to be a hot-button topic with some list members, but that is my consistently positive experience for the past eight years. Of course, I don't use shavings for bluebird, TRES or ash-throat boxes.  There are some published recommendations for lining box bottoms with shavings for chickadees and white-breasted nuthatches, but they seem to           utilize boxes with and without shavings with equal frequency.  In most cases, shavings are a necessity for inducing northern flickers to nest and we are in the early stages of experimentation with various box-levels of shavings for Lewis's woodpeckers.  Don McCartney Bend, in the high desert of central Oregon TBN and NABS member


From: judymellin [mailto:judymellin"at"netzero.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 5:24 PM
Re: mites on nestling

So, here we go with regional differences again! At the end of a hatching/fledging in my area, the tree swallows leave a filthy nest but the ones from the bluebirds look as if they have never been used! The inside if the tree swallow box is splattered with feces but the bluebirds seem able to carry away all the fecal sacs- I wish my house were as clean! I do remove used nests after the young have fledged, if I get to the boxes before another nesting is started. At the end of the season, though, I scrub out all the boxes that were used with a bleach,dishwashing soap and water solution. I have never seen a blowfly or mite and I firmly believe it is a result of cleaning the boxes every fall. Now I know there are those who feel that there is some type of wasp that has a positive effect on blowflies (well, maybe not positive for the blowflies!) but, since I apparently don't have the problem, I apparently don't have the wasp! I am a firm believer in live and let live so all I do, once a week, is open the box, look inside, close the box quickly and walk away to make my notes. It might be good to remember that birds nesting in natural cavities make it on their own. I treat the birds that choose boxes on our trail the same way. I can say that, since I began monitoring this trail in 1993, the only young that have been lost were usually over Memorial Day when it got either very hot or very cold. I did find one perfect adult male dead in a box with nesting materials clutched in a foot. Not bad for all these years! Judy Mellin NE IL.


From: "Bruce Burdett"
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: mites on nestling

John & Barbara, Personally, I prefer to clean out my boxes NOT at the end of the season, as you mentioned, but right after every fledging. Usually,by fledging time, my nests are too infested, filthy and beaten down for any self-respecting Bluebird to build on. Bruce Burdett SW NH


From: MJShearer [mailto:eshearer"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 4:19 PM
Re: mites on nestling

Hi Judy, Bruce, and all.... You're lucky if you've never had a mite infested nestbox! Maybe it is a regional problem, but I clean my boxes between nestings with a mild Clorox solution, and my most of my boxes still have some mites -- some more than others. Believe me, when you have a mite infested nest box, you'll know it! They'll be crawling all over the box -- inside and out. The adults keep the nestbox clean until the day of fledging, then they abandon their housekeeping duties, perhaps to encourage the nestlings to fledge. Bluebirds don't seem to have as many as some other species, but feather mites are a real problem for the Cardinals around here. Sometimes they loose all the feathers on their heads. Maybe they're not able to groom their heads as well as the rest of their bodies, but it's strange and a little sad to see those beautiful birds without their crests and head feathers. MJ (Mary Jane Shearer; Tucker, GA)


From: JOHN & BARBARA SIBIO [mailto:jsibio"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 5:29 PM
Subject: Mites and cleaning

I haven't had a problem with mites (so far) but the nestboxes stay pretty clean.  I remove the nest the day the last chick fledges, and just brush the box out with a stiff brush.  Usually the box is quite clean; sometimes there is some fecal matter on the walls, and I just brush it off as well as I can.  After the season ends I go at the box with my rubber gloves, some bleach in water, and the garden hose!  I give it a good scrubbing, hose it out,  and leave the box open until it dries out, to both dry it and air it.  I think I will use the diatomaceous earth this fall when I weatherproof the box.  I've read on this list that some put pine needles or grass in for the roosting birds, but I've never done that and they have roosted there every winter.  I may try that too!
Still learning....Barbara in Cloverdale, CA


From: Kenny Kleinpeter [mailto:kpkmajk"at"cox.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:00 PM
RE: mites on nestling

Parasitic insects don't "over-winter" in nestboxes because they can't survive more than a week without a host. We should be very sure why we are using things like Clorox (tm), a very strong chemical combination of sodium hypochlorite and sodium hydroxide. We shouldn't confuse our personal, human perceptions of what constitutes "clean" with the reasonably assumed negative impact to an entirely different and much more vulnerable creature the likes of a tiny, just-hatched nestling. Certainly no more than a 10% bleach solution in water should be used. Most detergent labels will tell you never to mix them with bleach, so please be careful. I wish we would err on the side of caution and never introduce chemicals anywhere around these little birds that we attract. They have enough problems trying to survive off insects that we spend billions of dollars a year poisoning! On behalf of bluebirds, please allow me to take exception to the notion that "birds nesting in natural cavities make it on their own." Such a statement is an affront to the courageous and dedicated people like Thomas Musselman and William Duncan who, during the last century worked so hard for the bluebird recovery efforts. In 1950, most people in America had never seen a bluebird. If there were any "natural cavities" left, they were taken by starlings or sparrows. There is no documentation as to the success rate of bluebirds nesting in natural cavities. A hundred and fifty years ago, I dare say, the predation rates for bluebirds in natural cavities were extremely high. Only the sheer number of these birds countered the risks they took in such an environment. Those numbers of bluebirds were supported by a much greater volume and variety of insects then we have today. So, it would probably be more accurate to say "bluebirds only made it on their own before humans arrived." I dare say that we are the bluebird's worst predator. We preyed on the bluebird's natural cavities by clear-cutting and introducing non-native, invasive species until they were nearly extinct. Now, we must intervene again, but this time, to save them. This must involve more than the casual checking of nestboxes; this bluebirding is a full-time job. We must closely inspect the bluebird's territory for competitors and predators. We must closely inspect nests for signs parasites. Problems like blowfly infestations are difficult to detect. In fact, most of them take their blood meal in the evening and drop back down into the safety of the nest during the day's activities. We must carefully but regularly inspect eggs and hatchlings until they fledge. Finally, we should remove the nest for the next attempt. Only through these informed, careful inspections and documentations will we learn to improve the bluebird's chance for survival. As many of us as possible must become obsessed with these birds in order to learn as much as possible about their needs in an ever-changing environment due to our ever-increasing human impact. Kenny Kleinpeter Baton Rouge, LA


From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"tds.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: cleanouts

Michelle, John, Judy, et al,I think I may have mistakenly left the impression that I clean out boxes ONLY after fledgings. I also clean them out with extra thoroughness at the END of the season, though I have never used Clorox, or any such chemical product. Maybe I should, but I never have. I just use a stiff brush and a steel scraper. (hive tool) Bruce Burdett, SW NH   


From: Haleya Priest [mailto:mablue"at"gis.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 11:17 PM
Re: mites on nestling Haleya Priest Amherst MA

I would also add from my own experience that I don't think clorox bleach after nesting is going to solve the mite problem. From what I see, the birds bring them in when they come to nest OR when an infested bird perches on a box. So I think as Kenny is suggesting, mites don't over winter, but are brought back by migrating birds - where they over wintered on the birds in warmer weather that didn't kill the mites. :-) H


From: PaulaZ"at"columbus.rr.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:49 AM
Subject: More mites

Just an afterthought on mite discussion. I posted this last year, but will again for those that did not see it. My trail is adjacent to a house that has chickens and pigeons. Although I don't see mites in the EABL nests, the TRES nests generally are swarming with them. As I said, it is "mitey" disgusting. I deduced that many of the feathers the birds bring in to line their nests could be infested with mites from chickens or pigeons so last spring I gave them clean feathers to line their nests with. I did notice less mites on the nests after fledging. As I write this, my scalp is tingling because the first time I removed TRES nest, I felt mites on my arms and head before I saw them. They are amazingly tiny and even more amazingly fast for their size. As Haleya said, there are a gazillion of them, but birds still fledge fine for most part. I have never attributed a loss to mites to my knowledge. After I remove nest, remaining mites soon leave too as there is nothing for them to eat. So I would recommend tossing some clean feathers near the TRES nestbox during nest building. If you time it right, they swoop and catch them in midair and take them into the box - quite a sight and fun for children of all ages. Paula Z Powell (Central ) Ohio


From: Burnham, Barbara [mailto:Barbara.Burnham"at"zzz.zzz]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: mites on nestling

To help identify your pest, catch one or more gently on a piece of cellophane tape. Then it might hold still while you look at it through a loupe or microscope.

The purple martin web site http://www.purplemartin.org/ has an excellent section on nest parasites, with drawings, pics and lots of info.

Barbara Burnham, Ellicott City , MD


From: Brucemac1"at"aol.com [mailto:Brucemac1"at"aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:03 PM
Subject: Lice

Hello Again Keith.....

Last season, several of our trail monitors lost fledglings to infestations of lice.

One of our trail monitors (a farmer) has suggested placing a teaspoonful of Poultry Lice Powder underneath the BB nest.

What are your thoughts concerning this proposed action...?

Waiting to hear from you.

Bruce Macdonald


From: Chuck Jensen [mailto:cjensen"at"dts9000.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:16 PM
Subject: RE: Lice

Purple Martin nest monitors sprinkle a little Severn powder in the nesting material when mites are present…but not on the nestlings. Works like a champ. Hold on now…don’t bother lighting those flame throwers. Better that the nestlings have an infinitesimal chance of harm from the Severn than certain death from the lice/mites.

Chuck Jensen


From: Robert Richerson [mailto:roblrich"at"alltel.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Lice

You are correct Chuck, Sevin is the way to go. Sevin works wonders on lice, mites, and even Blowfly Larvae if treated at an early stage. Years ago PM landlords went away from Sevin and to Diatomaceous Earth, then only recommending nest replacements, and the cycle is back to Sevin.

Studies found that DE was the worse option as nest box cameras showed PM fledglings will flop their wings in earnest working up their strength for their maiden voyage. When flapping their wings, the DE dust becomes a cloud in the nest box and the nestlings have to breath this abrasive substance. A nest replacement although nice and comfortable especially when nest material is wet, will not get the parasites off the nestlings or the parents, so infestation will reoccur in hours.

So the PM Community for the most part has come back to Sevin, using a teaspoon place in the front of the nest and allowing it to sink into the nest material not getting on the nestlings by tapping it down. Some swear that a teaspoon added when the nest building is taking place is all that is needed for the entire season, and no further activity is needed.

So after years or research, PM landlords have learned that nothing is nearly as effective as 5% Sevin Dust for bird parasites. Careful dusting at the onset of pest infestation effectively eliminates them. Usually a one-time application solves the problem for the breeding season. Data from the EPA clearly shows that this pesticide is safe. Certainly, the risk of chick mortality is greater from pests than from Sevin.

Robert


From: rob barron [mailto:rebel1956"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: Lice

OK, no flame throwers, but I’m a wildlife biologist and licensed pesticide applicator, and here’s some food for thought.

Although similar, mites and lice are two different arthropods. Lice are usually species specific and usually feed on the protective sheath of growing feathers. They don’t suck blood but can feed on irritated skin. Secondary infections are usually the cause of mortality from these lousy ectoparasites. Mites, on the other hand, do suck blood and can cause anemia or even death in birds.

Sevin (Carbaryl) is an organophosphate currently under review by the EPA. It is a cholinesterase inhibitor that acts on the acetylcholine in the central nervous system and red blood cells. The EPA’s 2005 statement on Carbaryl says it is probably more toxic to small passerine birds, highly toxic to honey bees, restricted in use in many areas with threatened and endangered species, toxic to fish and amphibians, need I go on?

Yes, you might still be able to find it at Walmart, but Sevin is nothing to take lightly. I would treat the empty nest box first and then use a Pyrethrum based insecticide before using Sevin as a last resort. Bluebirds are important to us, but they are just one link level in an interrelated food chain, all of which must stay intact or it all starts to fall apart.

You’re probably all too young to remember Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, but pesticides have done nothing but harm to wildlife. Preventing the loss of several fledglings on a trail must be balanced with the ecological consequences caused by our well intentioned actions. Bluebirds have evolved naturally with ectoparasites without our intervention. Are we helping the gene pool of a species that can’t survive without our intervention at every step of the egg laying, incubation, and rearing process? It’s something to ponder.

Here’s an interesting link for more opinions on the use of organophosphates.

Thanks,
Rob Barron-Woodstock, Georgia


From: Robert Richerson [mailto:roblrich"at"alltel.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: Lice

It is nice to keep this a "flame free" emailing list. With that said I do have some opinions and I will state them strongly and hopefully clearly. And to post a disclaimer, I am also a Purple Martin landlord. By default, most PM landlords are also BB and Tree Swallow landlords. I am the first to recognize that there is a difference in numbers in regards to these birds and the burden on their respective landlords. BB nests are much easier to give special care to than it is to a very large PM colony. Please keep that in mind when reading the rest of this email.

Chuck Abare, a very respected PM landlord and resource for the 'Purple Martion Conversation Society' was asked to study this subject by the PMCA. Below is an excerpt from Chuck Abare's report touting the use of Sevin. The entire article can be read at http://www.purplemartin.org/forumarchives/archive/sevinpro.htm

///The EPA's own data from their Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) shows just how safe Carbaryl (Sevin) really is. In order for Carbaryl to even affect a human, 5.48 mg/day. It has a moderate to low mammalian toxicity. It is not considered to be an oncegen (tending to cause tumors). It is a weak mutagen (tending to cause mutations) and available data indicates that it has only low teratogenic potential (causes extreme malformations or monstrosities). Carbaryl is not expected to contaminate groundwater. While it is extremely toxic to aquatic invertebrates and honeybees, it has only low toxicity to birds. An important aspect of Carbaryl is how quickly it breaks down and is redered harmless. Its insecticidal properties are lost after 3-10 days. Most animals, including humans, readily break down carbaryl and rapidly excrete 75% of it in 24 hours. Data suggests that there is low to very low toxicity to birds.///

I am very glad the Purple Martin crowd has put this subject to rest. They fought and studied it for years, and finally came back to the conclusion that the pros out weigh the cons. Also to be considered, the PM is more acceptable to parasites as they live in colonies and in such close proximity of each other.

It is much easier to do nest replacements in a Bluebird box every two or three days when there are heavy infestations than it is to lower very high housing and gourds and replace several dozen to many hundreds of Purple Martin nests. "To most" in regards to PM Colonies, this isn't even a discussion any longer.

Also, the notion "Bluebirds have evolved naturally with ectoparasites without our intervention. Are we helping the gene pool of a species that can’t survive without our intervention at every step of the egg laying, incubation, and rearing process? It’s something to ponder.", just doesn't wash any longer. With humans introducing Starlings and HOSP's taking away the Bluebirds and PM's natural nesting places and already making them almost 100% dependent on humans for nesting places, humans have already put this responsibility on themselves.
But I agree if you have a single to a few BB nest boxes and can handle parasites with frequent nest changes, this is the way to go. I'll even do this with my own BB nest box that will actually be in a newly prepared natural gourd. But when it comes to my PM Colony, they are going to get some Sevin dust. PM's have a multitude of problems such as predators, storms, migration dangers, etc, etc, so I don't plan on losing any to parsasites or S &S prob's. Those are two things I can control.

Some people want to argue that using sevin is illegal. Well technically, changing out a nest is illegal also.
...


From: rob barron [mailto:rebel1956"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 10:16 PM
Subject: RE: Lice

Hi Rob,

...

Thanks for your well researched and well thought out response. I’m building a purple martin house now and if I’m fortunate enough to get any to occupy it I’ll defer to your expertise.

I can Google “EPA” and “Sevin” and get a thousand hits of contradictory information from as far back as 1993, so I don’t have any more faith in the EPA data on pesticides affecting wildlife than I do them protecting our water supply from mercury or perflourootanoic acid, but in the case of purple martins I agree with the judicious use of organophosphates by people knowledgeable in using them. I don’t think any data on organophosphate health effects on humans applies to songbirds, with their shorter life span and more rapid development, higher metabolisms, rapid digestion, diets of insects gleaned from our chemically over-treated lawns, etc. We are responsible for their lack of a place to nest, we didn’t introduce ectoparasites. In the case of a threatened or endangered species, more drastic measures are definitely warranted. Anyone can find EPA statistics to support whichever side they are on. I’m not taking sides, but think we have to think about all species before getting out the pump sprayer.

I agree with most of your arguments about our responsibility to cavity nesters because of our past environmental sins (and respect all your points), but I think we have a lot more to learn and that the indiscriminate pesticide use in apple orchards (an introduced species which probably for a time increased bluebird abundance to an all-time high) might have had as much to do with bluebird problems as the lack of cavity nests. It wasn’t studied enough as it was happening and none of us really know for sure; we all just have our hypotheses and theories.


From: Chuck Jensen [mailto:cjensen"at"dts9000.com]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: Lice

Rob,
I have to go with Robert on this one, but first let me set the record straight—I know the difference between Sevin pesticide and the Severn River in Maryland. My original posting was obviously influenced by a brain cramp.

Rob, as far as the EPA is concerned, I don’t have absolute faith in them, but I defer to their science while leaving open the idea that some of the data and conclusions may be slightly skewed one direction or the other—that’s the nature of this type science. Only recently has ‘politics’ been allowed to start influencing scientific conclusions—mad medicine.

Citing various physiological characteristics of birds, such as small body mass and high metabolism is a statement of fact but is not probative of the potential impact of Sevin or any other chemical, natural or man-made. The fact that organophosphates are, in general, quite toxic, may be true, but that does not speak to Sevin specifically. If a mite is immersed in Sevin whereas a nestling inadvertently inhales a microscopic quantity of Sevin, the outcome can not be expected to be the same, though both were exposed to Sevin. Everything is about dose and toxicity to a specific species. And some times, even the developmental stage of a species. For instance, Sevin on very early stage blow fly will wipe them out. Sevin on mature blow flies (a difference on only a few days) is like dusting them with talcum powder. If Sevin is wildly toxic, you would expect it to be deadly toxic to the blow fly in all stages.

In sum, the morphology of birds and the potential toxicity of organophosphates give one reason to be cautious about its use. Nonetheless, specific empirical data trumps broad sweeping conclusions every time. From a practical standpoint, I’ve had mites a few times in my PMs and the Sevin was very effective with no fatalities. I’ve yet to find mites in a BB nest but would probably change nesting material (even though it’s illegal) first if the infestation wasn’t too bad.

Note: Not intended to be flame throwing—just warm to the touch.

Chuck Jensen


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Lice

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas a warm 45*F already

USDA Farmer Bulletin No. 801 issued 1917 revised 1931 titled Mites and Lice on Poultry

The mite Dermanyssus Gallinae L. is a night time blood sucking mite. It feeds on birds at night and hides in crevasses or bedding material during the day. Within 12>48 hours after receiving a meal of blood the mature female deposits from three to seven pearly white and elliptical eggs laid singly in the cracks in which the adults are hiding. The operation of feeding and depositing is repeated as many as eight times and from 25>35 eggs in all are deposited. The complete cycle from egg to adult requiring not more than 7 days.

There are pages of information on this species and pages of "control". It was interesting to note that neither sulfur or lime dusts work at repelling or killing this species of mite. They drench the poultry houses with different concoctions of coal tar emulsions and kerosene but crude oil is almost as good as it creeps into the cracks in the wood and repels later infestations. They also recommend the same arsenic solutions on chicken/buildings as they use on cattle but you have to be careful not to poison the chickens with arsenic.

If you have this specie of mite in massive numbers in a bluebird box it sounds like you could easily kill out the entire colony of mites by swapping out the nestbox and old nest with a different box and clean nest. You could drown all of the mites with warm soapy water by submerging the box in a five gallon bucket of warm water with just enough soap to raise a few bubbles at the top. These mites survived for more than 5 months without feeding on blood. They are found in all areas of the USA.

Feather Mite: Liponyssus silvearum Can. and Fanz. was a newly introduced mite at this time and just was found in a very few localities.

"The source of the mites on the fowls could not be determined with certainty. The nests of the English Sparrows built in close proximity to some of the infested poultry yards were found to harbor the mites." Normally the mites remain on the fowls continuously, the eggs being deposited and hatching among the feathers where the young mites may complete their entire development without leaving the host. The skin is sometimes quite scabby owing to the irritation produced by their bloodsucking habits. The fact that this mite breeds in the feathers of the fowls and often multiplies excessively makes it an important pest once it is established.

Control of the Feather mite: Dip every well feathered fowl in a tub containing a solution of one gallon water, two ounces Flowers of Sulfur and one ounce soap. Remove and burn the nesting material in the hen house. All nests of English Sparrows which are accessible should be burned and attention given to the destruction of these nests throughout the spring. In addition treat the roost perches with a 40% strength solution of Nicotine Sulphate (made from tobacco) every two weeks just before dark at least three times.

Next they list the scaly-leg mite, Depluming mite and five more, they also list the Chigger or red bug but I need to go to work. They have drawings of about 7 different lice that are common and how to treat for them. Sodium Fluoride is used as a gas in many cases for getting rid of lice or Nicotine Sulphate.

I also have a farmers bulletin on controlling "White Grubs" or the May or June beetle larva from this era and they recommend using 1,500 POUNDS of Lead Arsenate (lead oxide and Arsenic) per ACRE to protect corn fields in the upper Midwestern states. So we have to always believe that what is safe today may prove a problem in the long run. In an old science book, the USA was importing about 8 million pounds of Arsenic a year during this era. KK


From: rob barron [mailto:rebel1956"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 3:46 PM
Subject: RE: Lice

... I can’t argue with your well reasoned approach. I have read a lot about pesticides being metabolized more quickly by growing birds and my point was that even if the EPA says Sevin in safe for humans, the amount a baby bird might ingest might be a much larger dose.

I don’t like the availability of potentially toxic chemicals to the general public, almost always with little or no instruction about how and when to safely use them. In grew up working on farms where Sevin, Timic, and I don’t remember what else were indiscriminately used by untrained farm workers (my brothers and I included). It ran off into my favorite fishing pond and got in our well. We used to fill sprayer tanks with a mix of fertilizers and insecticides and reach in up to our armpits to stir it up while filling the tanks with water. My twin brother died of leukemia at 30, my older brother was diagnosed at 49, my father at 70. Numerous other farm boys in a 10 square mile radius had mysterious medical issues from blindness to sudden paralysis. Maybe it’s all coincidence. With that said, I’ll defer to your expertise and stop beating this dead horse.

Thanks again,
Rob Barron



From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:12 AM
Subject: using insecticides inside nestboxes

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
It looks like we need to identify the pest or pests that we find in nestboxes, look at their life cycle and how long the birds will be in the nest and make a decision on whether to treat or not with a pesticide.

5% Sevin at one time was made/registered for treating lice and mites on poultry and also fleas and ticks on dogs. It is not registered for these uses anymore. Nicotine Sulphate has been removed from the market.

There are various Permethrin or Pyrethroids on the market that are registered for use on animals.

Purple Martins remain in a communal house for months and pests spread from compartment to compartment. Bluebirds and Tree Swallows are in the boxes for less time and often switch to a clean box for a second nesting or we could easily use a dip for the entire nestbox or use a spray bottle and kill mites/lice in nooks and crannies in the empty nestbox with a chlorine bleach solution or soapy water that I assume would have few lingering effects between nesting attempts by the birds.

The adult birds will always have some sort of parasite on them and they control these with bathing in water, taking dust baths, "anting" and spreading their feathers to allow sunlight to drive the pests off of their bodies. Young birds in a nestbox cannot remove parasites that build up populations in a few nestboxes as the season progresses but upon leaving the nestboxes they should be able to remove most of these pests.

The average bluebirder will seldom find any pests that will affect a majority of their nestboxes so you should not bother treating or worrying about every nestbox every nesting attempt. You should look into every nestbox several times every nesting attempt and I like a side opening or front opening box so that I can easily check the nesting material top to bottom without touching it. Look at every old nest you remove especially if you have a trail and have lost some young birds in other boxes.

Blowflies can be a problem some years in some locations. Ants of several different species may want to use your nestboxes, Fire Ants may kill some young birds. Wasps probably will use some of your nestboxes and I prefer to use a putty knife to remove the nests and not kill the queens early in the season but to drive them to another location.

The only insecticide you should use in bluebird type nestboxes would be one of the pump spray mite/lice sprays made for canaries or parakeets. Follow the directions (one little spritz of spray in a small box will NUKE any insects, don't soak the wood) and only use in an empty nestbox after the young have flown or remove the eggs or baby birds and usually the nest before spraying a MAJOR infestation. If you only see a couple of mites or lice I would not treat with chemicals inside the nestbox.

Any chemical or oil or even soap that gets on a bird egg will be absorbed through the calcium in the shell and possibly on into the blood stream of the developing bird.

Purple Martins, pigeons, starlings and House Sparrows are often communal nesting and roosting/feeding together and they share mites and lice and diseases among each other more than say bluebirds, chickadees and titmice ETC. Use common sense first to see if you need to use a chemical as the last choice. KK



From: Dottie, Hickory Hollow, Brown County, Indiana [mailto:yumyumkatts"at"voyager.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: using insecticides inside nestboxes

The Purple Martin people in the Central Indiana Purple Martin Asso., a club formed for Purple Martin people in central Indiana a few years ago, use
Sevin in their Martin houses and gourds. I followed their lead and put
Sevin in my Martin house and gourds also along with pine needles and a little Indiana clay mud.

Most of the Purple Martin people also do nest changes regularly--several
times before the Martin babies fledge. It's fun to watch the nests being
changed.

I haven't had to do nest changes, unfortunately, as I've only had one Martin pair to nest last year and have babies after four long years of
trying to get Martins. And playing Dawn Song until my husband went nuts.

However, two bachelor Martins, who wanted to mate with the female, killed the Martin babies.

Looking forward to this year and better success. Martins start coming
back up here around March 15th.

Dottie, Hickory Hollow



From: Mary Clare [mailto:maryclare"at"cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:22 AM
Subject: Western Bluebird spreading wings on ground

I recently observed 2 Western Bluebirds ( M & F ) land on the ground and put their heads down, spread their wings and lay there in the sun for about 1 minute in our front yard.

Is there any significance to this behavior?

The temperature was about 75-80F on a clear dry southern calif day.

We have 6-7 Western Bluebirds that we see on a regular basis at our mealworm feeder. They have nested here for 2 years.

Thanks-
Mary Clare Schlesinger
Escondido, CA



From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: Western Bluebird spreading wings on ground

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
This is fun to see but the birds are using the sun to drive off mites or lice from their feathers. If you were able to look closely you would probably have seen them raise up the feathers on their necks and head to allow the bright sun light to shine down to their skin. The mites or lice will rush out of the light and head down to the lower or dark side of the bluebirds where some of them will end up in the grass or dirt. Thus the bluebirds succeed in removing some of these blood sucking pests.

I would watch this pair to see if they repeat this over the next several weeks. They will sometimes do this while sitting on a tree branch. Check their old nest after the first young fledge by shaking the nest over a colored sheet of paper. Mites and lice are nearly clear and have little body pigment to protect them from UV rays of the sun. When they drink blood it shows up in their digestive tract first as bright red and later as dark brown.

Often as soon as the birds finish sunbathing you will see them preening their belly feathers and wing feathers with their bills. They are now sweeping or combing the mites or lice off their feathers.

Mites and lice are tiny creatures that will hide in the cracks of wood nestboxes. Or they will hide in the dust in the bottom of the boxes or old nesting material. I have seen ants collecting pollen from flowers and I will assume that sometimes when we find ants in nestboxes they may actually be only hunting old insect parts or very possibly they will capture and eat mites and lice when they encounter them or their eggs. Ants are scavengers on the most part except for the several imported fire ant species.
Cormorants will spread their wings while sunbathing to help their feathers dry. KK


From: Fred Vroom [mailto:fqvroom"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:37 PM
Subject: Nest Material and Insecticides

Questions for the Bluebird List,
Do you recommend putting anything in nest boxes such as cedar shavings?
Do you think cedar shavings reduce pests such as mites, flies and other insects?
Where can you get cedar shavings?
Checking Lowes, Home Depot and Garden Centers, I found some possible substitutes:
Cypress mulch which look like wood shavings that might work well in a nest.
Canadian Sphagnum which looks and feels softer and I think should work.
Rubber Stuff which looks and feels a lot like the Cypress and Sphagnum; it must be shredded tires and smells like rubber—it seems to me this might not be ideal.

Also, considering that insects can be a major problem the adults and fledglings, it seems logical to me to use some insecticide to make their lives more pleasant. I am considering using pyrethrines 0.02% and Peperonyl Butoxide 0.2% to put under nesting material. If you do not recommend an insecticide, what is the proof it causes a health problem?

Thanks,
Fred Vroom
Tallahassee, Florida


From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"verizon.net]
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: Nest Material and Insecticides

Fred V.,
Speaking for myself, I never put anything in my houses. I try to see to it that all my houses are completely cleaned out - scraped and wire-brushed - before the nesting season begins. I don't used bleaches, soap-and-water, insecticides,fungicides, herbicides, or any other -cides.
I gather that some people use shavings in the winter to encourage "roosting."

Bruce Burdett
The New Hampshire Bluebird Conspiracy
SW NH


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Nest Material and Insecticides

Shavings: Thin wood shavings can get wet and hold moisture, sphagnum moss is used in plant soils to HOLD water. You can test the insecticidal properties of "cedar shavings" by taking a few mealworms and placing them in a mixture of the shavings and their food and see if they die. Would someone who has these test to see if cedar shavings will kill the adult beetles or the worms and report back to the list? Flying squirrels often build their nests completely out of the fine outer bark of Eastern Red Cedar trees and these nests are often polluted with hundreds if not thousands of fleas.

Pine needles probably hold the least amount of moisture of any material you would add to a nestbox but why do this when the bluebirds will provide their own material for the new nests to be? Some people believe that a partial covering of nesting material signifies that a pair of birds has this nestbox "claimed". If so partial nests would/could/should deter a cavity nester when it inspects a nestbox for the first time. Other research shows that bluebirds PREFER and old nest left in a cavity.....I personally don't think adding nesting material will either help or hurt. Roosting season in early fall/winter is a different issue.

Insecticides in nestboxes: Treat your nestboxes if and when you have a MAJOR pest problem. Humans can possibly get all sorts of parasitic pests. We do not take intestinal worm medicine or wash our hair everyday with lice insecticides to prevent these pests because the treatments are designed for an infestation and NOT for preventative measures!

There are MANY different pyrethroids and synthetic combinations of this family of insecticides. These are slow killing insecticides. Normally they add a totally different super fast knock down insecticide that almost immediately paralyzes the insects nervous system to prevent an insect from running, hopping or flying as soon as it makes contact with the insect. This is called Piperonyl Butoxide and very small amounts instantly paralyze the insect while the pyrethroids slowly kill the insect. Any time you combine chemicals, over time while in storage, they will combine and recombine in their chemical chains and you can have MANY different combinations of chemicals in your insecticide or herbicide other than what is on the label. Look up the LD 50 of Piperonyl Butoxide and this will give you an idea if this is really a dangerous insecticide.

Blowflies for example that often infest active nests in the more northern states also have very tiny parasitic wasps that prey on the fly larva and pupa. In tests it has been found that tiny amounts of insecticides that remain in nestboxes months or years after being applied kill off the beneficial predators since they are so small but the larger blowflies are resistant to weak doses of insecticides so in effect if you apply these insecticides as a preventative you actually end up protecting some of the pests instead of killing them. Many pests live on the birds constantly and will not be in contact with an insecticide under the nesting material. Spiders often prey on insects around the nestbox and hide or lay eggs in old nesting material. Again you will be killing off natural predators instead of the target insects. I do NOT think that the percentages of material that Fred V. is asking about would harm the bluebirds only some of the non target insects that might actually help him in following years.

We each need to do our part to limit the number and amount of chemicals applied to the environment. In 1999 the Earth reached the 6 billion number of humans. Today at 7:16 PM they estimate that we will reach the 6&1/2 billionth human number. We are now adding a billion people every 12 years to the earth which is a new record and each human consumes and uses vast amounts of chemicals. Every tiny drop we elect not to use can actually make a difference. KK



From: Tree Greenwood [mailto:doctree"at"crosslink.net]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Nest Material and Insecticides (Fred's original)

On Fri 24 Feb 2006 at 21:37, Fred Vroom <fqvroom"at"comcast.net> wrote:
> Do you recommend putting anything in nest boxes such as cedar
> shavings?

Hi, Fred & the rest of the list,

Do I recommend? No. But I do sprinkle cedar shavings in the bottom of boxes, then add a layer of straw twisted into a nest-like bowl.

> Do you think cedar shavings reduce pests such as mites, flies and
> other insects?

Not in my experience. They are supposed to repel moths.

> Where can you get cedar shavings?

Any pet store or the pet section of sundry stores like Wal-Mart. I get the coarse shavings and avoid the finer cedar bedding.

> Checking Lowes, Home Depot and Garden Centers, I found some possible
> substitutes:

Both cypress mulch and sphagnum hold moisture. I would use neither. Shredded tires? Not me.

> ... I am considering using pyrethrines 0.02% and Peperonyl Butoxide
> 0.2% to put under nesting material. If you do not recommend an
> insecticide, what is the proof it causes a health problem?

I use a quarter teaspoon of Sevin under the nest material in my Martin houses when I see an infestation of blow fly larvae or mites. I used it last year in one Martin house when I lowered it and my arms were immediately covered with tiny red mites. The hatchlings in all four of the occupied compartments in that house were also covered with the mites. All the hatchlings survived and fledged and I took a hot shower.

I have a Tupperware salt shaker in my monitoring box (formerly held kitty litter) with powered Sevin sealed inside. I've never used it in a cavity other than the Purple Martin house where I found a serious problem.

_BUT_ my Martin colony is relatively small and new. I will offer 48 cavities for Martins this year if I get the new house put up, otherwise
36 cavities. I monitor regularly and often to catch problems early and, hopefully, correct them. A Martin landlord with a colony of 100 or more nesting pairs may need to take preventive measures, especially if their records show a history of prior infestations. I may choose to add Sevin routinely if I get heavy infestations of mites again this year and next. For now, my choice is to monitor and treat problems only when I find them.

R J 'Tree' Greenwood
Catlett VA



From: Tree Greenwood [mailto:doctree"at"crosslink.net]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: Nest Material and Insecticides (Keith's reply)

On Sat 25 Feb 2006 at 11:14, Keith Kridler <txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net> wrote, in part:
> Shavings: Thin wood shavings can get wet and hold moisture, sphagnum
> moss is used in plant soils to HOLD water. ...

Keith and group,

I agree that thin shavings hold water. Coarse shavings, too. But coarse shavings won't matt down and dry quickly. Moss? Chickadees like it.

> Would someone who has these test to see if cedar shavings will kill
> the adult beetles or the worms ...?

Cedar doesn't kill. It's supposed to repel. It does NOT repel beetles, in my observations, and definitely doesn't kill 'em. It does repel some types of moths, the reason cedar is used in chests and closets where woolens are stored.

> Pine needles probably hold the least amount of moisture of any
> material you would add to a nestbox but why do this when the bluebirds
> will provide their own material for the new nests to be? ...

In my experience, I occasionally see eggs laid or, more correctly, dropped on the bare floor of a birdhouse. The female bird will bring in bits of nesting material but can't build a nest under the egg that she dropped on the bare floor so it just stays there unless or until a monitor intervenes.

Female birds, including Bluebirds, that are driven from a nest during the time period that they are actively laying MUST lay the developed egg. If she doesn't, she will become 'egg bound' and die.
It's unusual but not rare for a songbird to have to abandon a partial clutch in a cavity taken over by a stronger compeditor. She and her mate have to find a new site quickly because she HAS to lay the next egg the next morning or risk death.

The most common cause of egg binding is poor diet, especially a lack of calcium. I try to keep egg shells or 'chicken scratch' (pulverized oyster shells) out for birds, especially during nesting season.

> Some people believe that a partial covering of nesting material
> signifies that a pair of birds has this nestbox "claimed". If so
> partial nests would/could/should deter a cavity nester when it
> inspects a nestbox for the first time. ...

Perhaps true for solitary nesters like Bluebirds and Tree Swallows. Colony nesters like Purple Martins want the company of others. Mirrors and decoys, human-built nests and smearing mud at the entrance to compartments are just a few of the common ways to convince young Purple Martins looking for a home site that they found a place where they'll have company.

> Other research shows that bluebirds PREFER an old nest left in a
> cavity.....I personally don't think adding nesting material will
> either help or hurt. ...

Personally, I try to always put something that's suitable for the species on the bottom of the compartment; wood shavings topped with saw dust for Kestrels and Owls, some straw spun into a bowl for songbirds and Swallows.

So why do I sprinkle in some cedar shavings? I have a bale of it left from when a grown daughter had ferrets. On the chance that it might repel some pests, I still use it on the bottom of nest boxes rather than toss it all into the compost bin.

> Insecticides in nestboxes: Treat your nestboxes if and when you have a
> MAJOR pest problem.
> Humans can possibly get all sorts of parasitic pests. We do not take
> intestinal worm medicine or wash our hair everyday with lice
> insecticides to prevent these pests because the treatments are
> designed for an infestation and NOT for preventative measures!

But humans, especially apartment dwellers, pay exterminators to routinely spray for cockroaches and other pests.

> There are MANY different pyrethroids ..[snipped to...]
>
> Blowflies for example that often infest active nests in the more
> northern states also have very tiny parasitic wasps that prey on the
> fly larva and pupa. In tests it has been found that tiny amounts of
> insecticides that remain in nestboxes months or years after being
> applied kill off the beneficial predators since they are so small but
> the larger blowflies are resistant to weak doses of insecticides so in
> effect if you apply these insecticides as a preventative you actually
> end up protecting some of the pests instead of killing them. ...

Definitely true. Also, the eggs of parasitic wasps need a protected place to survive the winter. In nature, that would be a natural cavity where the wasp eggs would remain in the nest. So we also destroy the nests when we clean out nestboxes...
unless we protect the old, soiled nests. I keep mine on shelves under the lean-to at the back of the barn for a year before mixing them into the compost pile.

> ... Many pests live on the birds constantly and will not be in contact
> with an insecticide under the nesting material. Spiders often prey on
> insects around the nestbox and hide or lay eggs in old nesting
> material. Again you will be killing off natural predators instead of
> the target insects. I do NOT think that the percentages of material
> that Fred V. is asking about would harm the bluebirds only some of the
> non target insects that might actually help him in following years.
>
> We each need to do our part to limit the number and amount of
> chemicals applied to the environment. ...[snip]

Buy beneficial fly predators instead of chemicals.
See http://www.sourcebiofly.com/

The previous owner of our rural home used Ortho products for every perceived problem. No bugs of any kind were allowed to survive, especially icky spiders as well as ants, flies ... and all the beneficial insects. I bought a package deal of a variety of beneficial insects the spring after we moved in -- trichograma wasps, lady beetles and praying mantis. Over 20 years later, we have a natural populations of all those critters around every year. We even watch for the egg clusters as we prune and protect them from excessive heat, cold and WOODPECKERS that love to feast on every praying mantis or walkingstick egg cluster that they find. It is fun to watch a Flicker at the feast, though.

Looks like we agree on principles but disagree on some details, Keith. Typical for the Bluebird list.

Take care,

R J 'Tree' Greenwood
Catlett VA


From: Denise [mailto:maltmomma"at"alltel.net]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:48 AM
Subject: Babies fledged and cleaning the box

Hi all, my 5 babies have fledged and my nestbox is nasty. The inside has bird droppings and I also noticed these tiny (I mean specks) of what I thought was dirt but they moved! I'm assuming this may be some type of mite? How do I clean the box to get all the droppings off and kill the mites without hurting the birds for future nestings? I discard the nest, don't I? Thanks y'all.
Denise
Cresson, TX


From: mrtony8 [mailto:philip.berry"at"mchsi.com]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: Babies fledged and cleaning the box

I use a stiff brush and a weak solution of bleach water. No problems.
Phil Berry



From: Torrey [mailto:torrey_canyon"at"yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 11:56 PM
Subject: not a paper wasp

Hi everybody,

I found something very interesting while checking half my trail yesterday. There was a hornet-looking thing (not a paper wasp) in an empty box, which i shooed out. Then i noticed a mud "coccoon" on the inside wall of the nestbox. I removed it & didn't take any pictures, both actions which i regret now.

Anyways, inside the mud coccoon was a large yellowish larva, looking just like a typical grub. My first thought was that it was a mud dauber coccoon, but it wasn't the right shape & didn't have any dead feeder bugs in with it. I didn't notice it last week, but i'm not going to swear it wasn't there.

Anybody have any ideas what it was? The mud coccoon was smaller than my thumbnail but bigger than my pinkie nail, slightly oblong, & had kind of a stalk at the top.

Thanks, Torrey

PS As of my box checks on Apr 15 & 18, 24 out of 115 boxes have active EABL nests, meaning at least 1 egg
-- There was a white egg in one box, so i'll have to see what the rest of the clutch looks like. I caught
2 female EABLs in their boxes (& missed another), one already banded & both second-year birds.

One box had a mouse nest with tiny pink babies, which i saw when i tossed so i carefully put the nest back.
33 boxes were empty (or had paper wasps). 4 boxes are totally broken & need to be replaced. The rest all had nests ranging from merely grass strands or feathers to complete-but-empty nests. Tree Swallows were present at 28 boxes, some empty & some with up to 2" of grass strands, but i don't expect eggs for another couple of weeks.

Torrey Wenger
Kalamazoo Nature Center
Kalamazoo, MI



From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: not a paper wasp

Keith Kridler Mt.Pleasant, Texas
Hey we got 3/10" of rain last night after I complained about the heat. Lots of severe storms blowing across the nation this spring.

I call what Torrey found a "Potters Wasp" because it makes tiny mud containers to put food in to raise a single young wasp or hornet. This insect looks like a miniature hornet in color but the wings are held at a slightly different angle when at rest. We find them building in all sorts of places and they will sometimes build under a gap in wood siding on a house.
They probably evolved hiding their pots under loose tree bark.

This is another one of Gods creatures that is truly amazing. They take little dabs of mud and create water tight pots or jugs that are basically round but with a flat bottom. When they go to seal off the pot they taper it off and place a small neck on the pot but then they normally add a rim to the neck so it looks like a tiny hand could reach out, grasp the neck of the pot and have a solid rim to grip and then use this to lift up the pot from where the wasp stuck it. This makes no sense at all because the young wasp when it hatches out chews out a small hole in the side of the pot and then it looks like a miniature birdhouse gourd. They sometimes line up a whole row of these pots in a single line sometimes you find them sitting in a group. Most of the time the pot maker only lives long enough to build two or three of these and leave them behind.

I feel early humans observed wild creatures and if you look at the pottery vessels that the vanished Indian tribes of the South Western states, the Anastasia, used to carry water and store grain to protect it from insects and rodents you will see that they are large copies of the tiny "Potters Wasp" creations.

Indians planted corn in "hills" and the Mexican farmers today still plant 10 seeds in a small 1 foot circle then plant 3 climbing beans or cow peas in the circle and move down 3 to 4 feet and plant another clump or circle of corn. They call these hills because they dug up only this small circle and fluffed up soil leaves a mound or hill. Anyway if you watch yellow shafted flickers they will steal a whole mouthful of sunflowers or whole corn and they carry this off to a spot in the yard or field and they bury the whole batch of corn in a "hill". I will almost bet you that 10,000 years ago a flicker in Mexico stole a mouthful of Maize and a few peas or beans and showed the Mayan or Inca's how to plant two of their main crops in their gardens...

Hang gliders have copied the flying squirrels.

...

You can watch the bluebirds all day long but if you want to be truly amazed borrow a microscope and study one of their wing feathers up close and personal. If you want to learn something from your children or grand children give them a digital camera that will take close up pictures and tell them to go out and shoot everything they like.


You should ALWAYS carry a camera with you! KK

...

http://www.cirrusimage.com/bees_wasps_potter.htm

Dang I thought I made up the name potter wasp. This is the species we see in
Texas and the southwestern states. KK


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:56 AM
Subject: tiny insects swarming the nestbox

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
A few days ago maybe longer, time seems to speed up during turmoil, someone mentioned seeing a lot of small insects on their nestbox after the young birds fledged. Rob I believe gave good advice on washing the box off for the second time in a few days to remove mites or lice.

Depending on the color of the outside of the nestbox and the size of the insects and the time of year in the location of the nestbox the insects very well could have been Thrips and not lice or mites. Thrips are a sucking insect that feed on tender plants, they LOVE different colors of flowers.
When they fly in swarms they may cover up one color of shirt someone is wearing but ignore another color right next to it. Normally if you wash out lice or mites there will be some left but they do not multiply that fast.
Thrips would congregate on their favorite color for up to several weeks before their population collapses. Thrips are actually smaller than most lice. Older ones are a dark gray or brown or black depending on your eyesight. Young thrip are honey colored.

There are also some very tiny gray insects that feed on decomposing vegetable matter (old damp bird nests) and these are very similar in size to a thrip but a beautiful dark mouse gray color. They will swarm together in moving clumps, normally right at ground level but I don't believe they can fly. They can "spring" or hop remarkable distances for their tiny size. KK



From: L. Field [mailto:gabriel"at"kendra.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: tiny insects swarming the nestbox/Lice removal

Oh I am so happy that I can contribute something here. I recently rescued a beautiful indian fantail pigeon from a neighbors' yard.
Unfortunately it was covered in lice. (Poor thing!) From checking on the web, I found the association of people of keep and show these birds, and actually found the breeder of this bird. I called her and she sent her son right out to come collect the bird. When he came he told me that they would give the bird a good wash with water and powdered borax, and then all the lice would be killed. He said that they washed their show birds this way to prepare for show, and that they not only were clean, but they smelled good after this, too.

I would assume that you could wash out an old nest box with the water/borax mix and that every single louse (even in a crevice) would die. That's what I'll do if I find myself in a similar situation re:
old nest boxes. In the meantime, I need to *get* some nest boxes!

Lynn
washington state


From: RBALTRUNAS"at"cs.com [mailto:RBALTRUNAS"at"cs.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:05 AM
Subject: OT: Bird Mites?

Help!

we are having a problem, a very serious problem.  2 months ago we began feeling like fleas were jumping onto our legs in our apartment.  We applied flea sprays and powders.  But these are either the world's tiniest fleas or some kind of mites.  I left my parrot outside often in Nov-Dec. he may have brought them in or they got i some other way. 

These things are too tiny to see.  It is maddening to feel them and not see them.  Worse yet, nothing seems to kill them off. 

Has anyone encountered such thing?  Are there bird mites that can jump and are super tiny? 

Anyone have any rememdies for fleas or mites?  We have tried 3 sprays and 2 powders and one bomb and they kill off most them they rebound.  We have used flea sprays with insect growth regulators and these have had no effect. 

This is horrible.  Anyone have any knowledge or ideas for good sprays with residual killing power?

Ron
Clearwater, Fl 
From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: Bird Mites?

There is a chance you have an insect called a thrip. They are tiny and can fly. Although they are typically a plant pest they do bite when they land on humans. Mites and lice normally just crawl and would not be that hard to kill. Thrip are normally a warm season insect but are attracted to light colored clothes and will be attracted to towels and sheets hanging on a clothes line.
 
For something like this that seems to have invaded your house you might want to purchase the automatic fly sprayers that are battery powered and give out a small burst of insecticide every fifteen minutes or so.
 
Country Vet is one that is sold at Tractor Supply companies. They use a weak dose of Permethrin that would be useful for killing thrip, mites, lice or fleas. You can move these around several times a day to cover different areas of different rooms. These are registered for use in houses and restaurants.
 
You should be able to buy a soap or shampoo formulated for head lice at most stores and these would work on whatever is getting on you also. Keith Kridler

Eastern Bluebird Photo by Wendell Long.  Click on photo to go to Wendell Long Photographs website. Eastern Bluebird.  Photo by Wendell Long

HOME - ASO

BEST OF INDEX
  Table of Contents

Articles
BB-L Reference Guide
Bluebird Box, The
  Table of Contents
Bluebird FAQ
Breeding Bird Survey
Bluebirders Pictures
Calls/Songs
Christmas Bird Count
Commercial Sites
Feeding Bluebirds
Forums/Mailing Lists
Gallery
Groups/Resources
Miscellaneous
Monitor Form
Nestbox Info
Personal Sites

First Egg 2000
First Egg 2001
First Egg 2002
Over Winter 2001
Over Winter 2002

Search

BEST OF BLUEBIRD_L CLASSIFIEDS HOME | Audubon Society of Omaha | The Bluebird Box | Bluebird FAQs | Search | Contact me
All material was originally posted on the Bluebird_L or Bluebird mailing list, and has been reposted here with slight modifications to make the posts more readable in an HTML format.  In cases in which quoted material has been deleted to save space, this is indicated by an ellipsis (...)
For more information about Bluebird_L, check out http://www.cit.corn.edu/cit-pubs/email/using-lists/index.htm. If you wish to contact the author of a post, you will need to edit the e-mail address, replacing "at" with the "at" symbol (above the number 2 on your keyboard). (This change was made to discourage spammers.)
If you are the author of a posting and would like to see a particular post (or posts) removed from these web pages, please contact me with the web page address, title of post, and date and time of the post(s), and I will remove whatever material you like.  If you have a different opinion from one posted here, you need not contact me, as often I will have a different opinion too. The intent is to try and provide both sides to the issues facing bluebirders, and to do so in an impartial and objective manner.
If you have problems, encounter broken links (unless they are within an e-mail thread, as I do not maintain those links), or have suggestions on how the site can be improved to make it more useful, please contact the Best of Bluebird-L Classifieds webmaster
Website design by Chimalis