Click to go to Audubon Society of Omaha Home Page Audubon Society of OmahaEastern Bluebird

Welcome to The Bluebird Box since 1995
Best of Bluebird Mailing Lists Classified

Nestboxes (Material - other than cedar & pine)

Also see Nestboxes Made of Plastic Bottles or Milk Cartons

In addition to Messages that have appeared in the Bluebird Mailing Lists on this topic, the following are on the Audubon Society of Omaha website: 


From: "Fread J" firefrost2"at"hotmail.com
Subject: Cypress wood for nest box construction
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:54:42 -0600

In Colonial and Victorian eras, the wood of choice for numerous construction projects, came from the Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum).Due to its relative slow growth, the growth rings are much tighter creating a dense (32 pounds per cubic foot) lumber with superb anti-checking or warping traits. This dense wood has the color and grain of Heart Pine. Although it is softer than Heart Pine and Red Oak it is hard enough to be used for flooring. It has a hardness similar to Wild Cherry or Chestnut. In times past it was used for interior moldings,doors, and paneling. Due to its "water-tightness" it was an excellent choice for cooperage, shingles, tanks, vats, ship and boat building as well as being used for railroad cars.

Cypress wood contains the natural preservative cypressene which gives it excellent rot resistance without the need for pressure treating applications with salts and heavy metals (i.e Copper, Chromated Arsenic). It is a renewable resource. Protected in wetland areas, there are still significant stands of harvestable lumber available. Selectively harvested, it is a sustainable specie.

A water-loving specie, Bald Cypress can attain heights of 145'. It has the unique distinction of being a deciduous conifer, losing its needles each fall. Hence its name "BALD" cypress. The round, ball-like cone it produces is a food item for squirrels, wild turkey, and wood duck. Prothonotary warblers reach their highest population densities in stands of cypress and tupelo where they will often nest in rotted "cypress knees".

"Cypress knees" are interesting structures produced by the root system of the Bald Cypress. Properly known as pneumatophores these knee-like growths provide additional support in wet soils and also aerate the water-logged roots. In addition to these structures, Cypress trees often form buttresses, a swelling of the lower trunk to provide additional support.

The choice of this wood for nest boxes would be outstanding as it would last for many years.

Fread J. Loane
Tulsa, Oklahoma


Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:42:39 -0400
From: dottyrogers"at"netscape.net
Subject: Re: ext plywood formaldehyde

Is there no longer any concern over the urea formaldehyde in exterior-grade plywood? Grooms & Peterson mention it in their 1991 Symbol of Hope book, but I haven't seen it since; and many of the newer publications are recommending plywoods?

Dot


From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler" kridler"at"1starnet.com
Subject: durable/rot resistant wood
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 09:23:11 -0500

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
In one of my forestry books (Southern Forestry by Charles N. Elliott & M.D. Mobley printed in 1938 by Turner E. Smith and Comp. of Atlanta GA.) they list 13 species of trees that can produce "rot resistant" logs or wood that were accepted for railroad ties without having them treated with creosote. These would last as long under the rails as the other species of trees (or these containing sapwood) would after they were "treated" with creosote. Each of these "heart" woods probably contain some form of toxins to prevent insects or fungus from destroying the tie.

Although harder to work with, some of these woods might be good to build nestboxes out of.

It must be noted that all of these HAD to be only from heart wood and would contain NO sapwood. They also were stating that nearly all of the "old growth" trees that you could harvest these quality ties from had already been cut that were accessible to loggers by 1934.

I am going to list them from #1 13 as they were actually broken up into four different price groups with each succeeding group/species being a lower value for railroad ties. Each species (group of species) should have the notation "heart" before it but I am going to drop it for this group. This was a school book and the chapter on wildlife and the feeding habits of birds was very interesting. It is a shame my son Shawn will never see this quality of text book in any of his classes!

#113 Black Locust, White Oak, Black Walnut; Douglas Fir, Pines, Larches;Cedars, Cypresses, Redwood; Catalpas, Chestnut, Sazzzfras, Red Mulberry.

You might note that Chestnuts for lumber are now extinct. They listed this tree as the most dominant tree east of the Mississippi and that it had the best wood for the most varied of lumber uses of any species of tree. It was also listed as the number one tree for producing food (mast) for wildlife and was the main source of food for the billions of passenger pigeons in the 1800's.

I have only ever seen one sazzzfras tree in Texas that was large enough to cut a tie out of. They said the Long Leaf and Loblolly pines in the south matured at "5 to 6 foot diameter trees." There were 23 other species or closely related groups of species of trees that were also listed that could be treated and used for railroad ties in addition to the above 13. KK


Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:02:57 -0000
From: "bartlett113" dement"at"frognet.net
Subject: Safe/Toxic Wood

Check out this Web address for a comprehensive listing of Safe/Toxic woods for birds: http://www.birdsafe.com/wood.htm. I believe the article refers to new wood - not dried(air/kiln). ...

Fred Yeager,
SE, OH


Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:42:08 -0400
From: "Fawzi P. Emad femad <at> fpemad <dot> com
Subject: Re: Safe/Toxic Wood...Fred, I am specially interested in this site since we have six parrots.  Knowing which woods are safe for them to chew is very important.  The address below did not work, can you please check it out and send to us again?  Thanks...

Fawzi


Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:47:37 -0400
From: "BONNIE A. YEAGER" dement"at"frognet.net
Subject: Re: Safe/Toxic Wood

Fawzi,
Here is a copy of the article. I tried to find the original literature reference which was supposedly published at UC-Davis, but no luck.
Hope this helps you.  

Fred Yeager,
SE, OH
 

********

      Safe and Dangerous Woods

      I would like to thank Pat Zaccardi of Feathers & Fun, and she would like to express her appreciation to all of the folks on the following Onelist Groups (Now EGroups): Cockatoos, Conures, and Conurepics.

 

      SAFE & UNSAFE WOOD FOR BIRDS
      (updated 10-24-00)

      Wash all wood in a bleach solution, rinse then for small branches bake in
      oven at 250 for about 1 hour and for  large branches wash, rinse and dry in direct sun.
 

      SAFE
 

      Acacia, Almond, Apple, Apricot (*see note below), Arbutus, Ash, Aspen, Bamboo, Beech, Birch, Bois d'arc (*see note below), Bottle Brush, Cherry (*see note below), Citrus, Cork Oak (*see note below), Cottonwood, Crabapple, Dogwood, Elm, Eucalyptus (*see note below), Fig Species, Fir, Fruitless Mulberry, Ginkgo, Grape Vines, Grape Palm, Guava, Hackberry, Hawthorn, Hazelnut, Hibiscus, Hickory, Horse Apple (*see note below), Ironwood, Larch, Lilac, Liquidamber, Madrona, Magnolia, Manzanita, Maple, Mediterranean Laurel, Mesquite (remove thorns), Mimosa, Mulberry, Nectarine (*see note below), Norfolk Island Pine, Nut (except Chestnut & Oak), Oak (wood only, no bark or leaves), (*see note below), Palm, Papaya, Peach (*see note below) Pear, Pecan, Pine, Plum (*see note below), Poplar, Prune (*see note below), Ribbonwood, Rose, Sazzzfras, Sequoia (redwood) (*see note below), Spruce, Sweet Gum, Sycamore, Thurlow , Tree fern, Umbrella tree, Vine Maple, Walnut (Black Walnut may be dangerous), Willow (Goat, Pussy & Weeping)

      A couple of woods appear on safe lists that shouldn't or should be noted that there are problems with some species.  Redwood has long been associated with rashes and the dust with lung and eye disorders.  It contains high levels of volatile oils that are known toxins.  Further exposure is believed to suppress the immune system.
 

      UNSAFE
 

      Box Elder Wood: UNSAFE
      Chinese Popcorn/Chinese Tallow:  UNSAFE
      Hemlock:  UNSAFE (see note below)
      Sumac:  UNSAFE (aka Rhus/Toxicodendron)

      Black Locust has been cited as causing some toxic reactions with birds, though members of this species are also known as the Acacia, which is listed as safe.

      Gillian Willis on her website says "Do not use apricot, cherry, peach, prune, plum or nectarine. These trees all belong to the Prunus species. They contain cyanogenic glycosides which release cyanide if ingested.

      There is some disagreement over whether cherry, oak and eucalyptus are toxic. However the wood should be safe but avoid the leaves and seeds and in the case of oak and cherry the bark as well.  (Safety on Cherry is questionable)

      London Tree is in the sycamore family, and is currently under research.

      Do not give the birds redwood.  The oils the wood contains are toxic.  But the biggest problem is if they get a splinter, redwood tends to block the immune response and they become infected quite easily.  Oak appears on a number of toxic lists, primarily because of the tannin in the leaves and acorns.  In the writer's opinion this is totally unjustified, the wood should be perfectly fine as it is not generally eaten and contains little tannin in most species.

      Cork Oak - (again avoid foliage and acorns) the bark of cork oak is safe for consumption even by humans whose tolerance for tannin is much lower than most bird species.

      Cork Oak is a safe wood to leave the bark on.  Cork oak has very low levels of tannin (far lower then other oaks) and the bark is just what the name says 'Cork"  Cork Oak is originally from southern Europe and is the source of all natural cork.  The bark is very thick and well, cork like.  It can be found wherever there are old wine growing areas as it was grown to provide corks for the bottles.  It is also found scattered around the southeastern US and California.  Because of it's very low tannin content it is safe for use in food storage (the cork in the wine bottle, oil bottles, etc.)  There is a similar species found native to North America, the Prairie Oak a variety of live oak is found throughout the great plains and east to Ohio.  It has a very thick cork like bark, however I do not know what the safety factor for this species would be.  Information on the composition of woods and related materials can be found in a number of publications, I don't remember the names off hand, but any university that has a good botany or agronomy department, or your university agricultural extension service should be able to direct you to the appropriate references.  When I was researching the safe woods for our birds the Calif State University Fresno Agricultural Dept was more than helpful, completely willing to answer any questions I had and to help me find the references.

      Eucalyptus -  while it appears on many toxic lists I have never been able to find a good reason for it being there. The level of phenols (the toxic elements in eucalyptus) is lower than in many pine species which are considered perfectly safe.  While you might want to avoid the foliage there doesn't appear to be any reason to do so. Considering that many lorikeet and cockatoo species eat the flowers and new leaves in the wild, and that it is the dominant native wood for Australia concern over it's toxicity seems exaggerated.
 

      Oak (except Tan Oak which should be avoided because of the VERY high tannin content) though there is some controversy about Oak it appears that the wood should be safe.  the bark leaves and especially the acorns have much higher levels of tannins and should be avoided.  While many bird species including many parrots regularly feed on nuts and vegetation that have levels of tannin much higher than oaks, it is unclear how their bodies deal with the substance and it is therefore probably advisable to avoid high doses.

      Cherry - this one is really controversial.  there are confirmed cases of dogs and of horses having fatal reactions to eating cherry wood.  However I have been unable to find any confirmed report of bird fatalities.  Regardless the sap is what contains the toxic elements (see Gillians Help pages) and that is contained primarily in the Cambium, a layer of material just below the bark.  If cherry is to be used it should be dry, debarked and any traces of sap removed.  Under no circumstances should fresh cherry, the foliage or bark be given to birds.

      Ginkgo - While the female Ginkgo may have an unpleasant smell the wood, bark and foliage all appear to be safe.

      Hemlock - The wood that is sold in lumber yards (sometimes called Hem Fir) is safe but the foliage is toxic. No other species of hemlock should be considered safe.

      Alder - The wood appears to be safe, but I have not been able to confirm this.

      Chinese Magnolia - The wood, foliage and flowers all appear to be safe, but I have been unable to confirm this. According to CSUF biologist and agronomists they could see no  reason to consider it dangerous (it is not a known toxic plant) but know of no reason to consider it completely safe either.

      Cedar occasionally appears on safe lists.  If Cedar is to be used, Red cedar should be avoided for the same reasons as redwood.  Yellow and Sitka Cedar may be safe though.

      Laurel appears on most toxic lists.  Most Laurel species are toxic but the Mediterranean Laurel is safe. Distinguishing the species can be difficult though and unless the species is known absolutely it should be avoided.

      One plant that deserves mention as it occasionally appears in gardens as an exotic ornamental is the Chinese Snake Tree.  This is a VERY TOXIC plant and even contact with the sap (through the skin) can present the risk of fatality to small animals and children.  It is sometimes called the Lacquer plant because it was the source of lacquer.

      Also to be avoided is the Pitch Pine.  It was the source material for turpentine and has VERY high levels of phenols.  Contact with the wood can cause rashes and the fumes from burning it have been known to cause lung and eye disorders.
 

      Bois d'arc, which is also called the Horse Apple tree, and this is in the Mulberry family and is a safe wood but I had to write a lot of bird folks.

***

Fred Yeager,
SE, OH


From: Orley Bourland [mailto:pegorley"at"erols.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 9:18 PM
To: bluebirdbox"at"cox.net
Subject: Bluebirds

Has any one had experience using the newer saw dust plastic decking material to construct blue bird boxes?? I have trouble with the roof deteriorating, splitting etc.

Orley Bourland


From: "Jim McLochlin" bluebirdbox"at"cox.net
Subject: RE: Bluebirds
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:40:11 -0600

Orley,

I believe I do remember this topic coming up, but I can't remember what the outcome was. Although I have a very limited background in nest box construction. I don't believe there would be a problem making the roof out of the plastic lumber. If adequate ventilation is used the whole box could be constructed from this material. The next major problem is how well does it protect the birds from the heat/cold. In other words what is the R factor compared to wood? Obviously it would no be any worse than that of boxes made from PVC.

I will keep looking, but in the meantime I will send your question and my response on to the mailing list bluebird-l.

Jim McLochlin
Omaha, NE ...


Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:52:35 -0800
From: Linda Violett lviolett"at"earthlink.net
Subject: Plastic/Sawdust Lumber

Linda Violett - Yorba Linda, Calif.

In response to the fellow who had deterioration with plastic/sawdust lumber, perhaps the brand of product or method of attachment (nails?/screws?) caused the nestbox deterioration. We installed a small platform at our mountain cabin using the brand, Trex (available at Home Depot), several years ago. No warping, no deterioration, no maintenance of the platform has been necessary in spite of cold mountain conditions. If I didn't have to hoist nestboxes up into trees, I would have already made a few nestboxes from this product. Trex is solid (not hollow core) and would seem to be an excellent material for sturdy nestboxes with long life and high insulation qualities. ...


From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler" kridler"at"1starnet.com
Subject: long lasting roofs/blatant adds
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:30:45 -0600

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
The sawdust/plastic decking might make a good roof but it is going to be a little narrow being a 1"x6" board. I am not sure if the entire box were made of this material if it would hold together long term as the fibers may tend to strip out nails/screws after a year or two. This is made to be screwed down to treated floor joists and holds up pretty well even in Texas heat. When used as a deck top the screws run through the plastic and not into a framing of plastic wood.

This material is over thick (about 1&1/8") and I made some nestboxes last night out of full 1"x6" wood lumber and this creates a nestbox with a floor of 3&3/4" X 6" or about 22.5 square inches. Try a few and experiment.

You can add a second "shade" roof over the main roof out of Hardi-board a cement material that Ron Kingston and others have been using in Virginia for many years. This is fairly thin and really needs a wood or possibly the plastic flooring under it to provide extra insulation. I use this cement board on roofs for large boxes like wood ducks and it resists rot and squirrel damage. There is a high damage rate on this material during shipping and handling and most lumber stores will give away the broken/damaged siding that is 8" in width by 12 feet long....

Jack Finch, "Homes for Bluebirds" in North Carolina has been wrapping his wood roofs for more than 20 years with thin sheetmetal and this makes them nearly "lifetime" of the trail monitor! He is also getting MANY years out of the boxes made from Paulownia wood. On page 58 of the "Bluebird Monitor's Guide" there is a picture of Jack standing beside a SIX year old Paulownia tree. The new hybrids of Paulownia Elongata are going to be a terrific tree for timber and shade all across the south (hardy to -10*F.) They make excellent light weight nestboxes.

Being a Texas Master Gardener and being in and around the nursery business for twenty years I did not believe the reports of growth on these trees but Jack sent me 12 pieces of root of this tree on May 19, 2001 and I transplanted one in the ground on June 19,2001 (I started them in 2 gallon buckets & gave most away and planted a few more in July and August) and in 16 months it was 30 feet tall, over 20 wide on the crown and at eye level the trunk measures over 7" in diameter. ANY tree that consistently grows 60" tall in both July and August in my area of Texas AND makes good wood for nestboxes will be great for saving our southern forests!

In the back of "The Bluebird Monitor's Guide" under suppliers you can buy mealworms, dogwood berries, boxes, traps, feeders ETC directly from bluebirders like Jack Finch (who grows and ships dogwood berries, white mulberry tree cuttings just for bluebirds & also sells Paulownia cutting for $2 each), Gilbertson, Van Ert, Springer, Ahlgren, ETC. David Magness for example is an avid bluebirder, created Jenna Bird and sells mealworms, traps and nestboxes ETC. Most of these guys sell at a fraction of the cost of the big mail-order catalogs....AND they ALL maintain trails!

... KK


From: abitabar"at"bellsouth.net
Subject: aluminum nest boxes, and roof size
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:20:15 -0500

I was at the local Wild Bird Center yesterday and saw an aluminum nest box. Has anyone else seen or used these before? It had double-walled sides to keep it cool, which, here in Louisiana, is great for our loo..oong, hot summers. (I suppose that feature would make it a poor winter roosting box but it might be worth it for people like me with only a few boxes to change it out for a wood box in winter.)

Speaking of nest boxes, they had a big assortment of them for bb's and other birds, of course, but most all have the standard small roof with almost no overhang. Why is it that most nest boxes are made this way? Why haven't most manufacturers caught up with the fact that larger roofs are better? To answer my own question, I guess it is cheaper to make and ship with a smaller roof. And perhaps the uneducated consumer thinks the smaller roof looks better.

Barbara
in Abita Springs, 30 miles north of New Orleans


From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler" kridler"at"1starnet.com
Subject: Re:aluminum nest boxes and small roof size
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:36:36 -0600

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant Texas

The aluminum nestbox is made by nature house, one of two large Purple Martin house manufactures. I have one but have not checked the heat gain in it as compared to wood nestboxes. It really does look like it will be fine for southern areas.

Small roof size: When we ship they measure the size of the box and adjust by the weight. A very large roof may double actual shipping costs. Also the more overhang the more leverage and the easier it is to get the box crushed and the roof destroyed.

Heat retained for roosting boxes. We participated in the Cornell Data Logger research on heat this past year. Thick wood boxes retaining more heat on a cold windy night than thin boxes is a MYTH. These data loggers recorded temperatures every two hours from March till August. The temperature inside about four different styles of nestboxes remained just about identical with outside temperature readings even when temperatures dropped 21* C in a two hour period. With out heaters in a nestbox the open entrance hole keeps the inside and outside temperatures about the same. It would make a bigger difference plugging up ventilation cracks and facing the roost boxes away from prevailing winds than the type of material the box is made of. Reduce wind chill inside the boxes to help roosting birds.

Sun adds a LOT of heat so when the sun strikes a nestbox THEN type of material and thickness make a difference. By one hour after sunset no matter what direction or material or thickness the nestbox is made of the temperature will be the same inside and out. (within a degree or two C) ... KK


From: "Larry A Broadbent" rockets"at"mnsi.net
Subject: Re: exterior plywood for roofs
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 19:02:00 -0400

Hi Haleya,
I'm currently build 2 North Star Purple Martin houses out of 1/2" MDO Plywood. Please note I'm saying MDO Plywood. NOT MDF. MDO Plywood proper full name is Material Density Overlay Plywood. It is the finest grade of exterior plywood available. But it is expensive. Norm Abrams of the New Yankee Workshop swares by the stuff for outdoor projects. And so do I. The US Government and Canadian Government Highway departments use MDO Plywood for Road Signs.

I told John R.C from Maryland about MDO Plywood, and now he is interested in trying the stuff out for his Kestrel boxes and some of his other cavity nesting bird nestboxes. It's available in 1/2" , 5/8", 3/4" etc.

If you need to know more about MDO Plywood, just ask, and I'll send you URL Links.

I will be using MDO Plywood for roofs on some of my Bluebird nestboxes as well as the entire box for some Kestrel boxes.

Regards,
Ontario Eastern Bluebird Society (OEBS) member http://www.ontarioeasternbluebirdsociety.org/
Essex County Purple Martin Association - member
Larry A Broadbent
Chatham, ON
Canada


From: Adthomas10"at"cs.com
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:33:09 EDT
Subject: plywood boxes

Hi Haleya
If you are near any construction sites you can get 3/4 inch plywood scraps that are used for subflooring (usually tongue and grove plywood) for nothing. . . Many times there are two-foot x four-foot pieces, and smaller that are tossed in a dumpster as trash. Builders use "yellow pine" or "fir" plywood. Fir will outlast the yellow pine. I have made many boxes with plywood and coat them with linseed oil. They hold up real well. The 3/4 inch MDO is an excellent plywood but very expensive. It is also used in making outdoor signs.

Dan Thomas
New Providence PA


From: "emcooper" emcooper"at"bayou.com
Subject: Plexiglass For Viewing Bluebirds
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:20:27 -0500

About a year ago, we had discussion about putting Plexiglas on the nestbox for viewing. Does anyone know if this was purchased or someone made one? I had someone ask me and I forgot if you could buy it or not.

Evelyn Cooper
Delhi, La.


Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:54:09 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
From: "Felix Swan" fdswan"at"conwaycorp.net
Subject: Lighted EABL Nestbox


Hi Birders
While visiting friends this past week we were suddenly greeted by a male EABL pecking on the large picture window we were looking through. Five of us were within three feet of the window at the time of this happening and were viewing Mt. Magazine which is about five miles from their house. A female EABL flew into the scene and landed on a porch railing about ten feet away and the male then joined her for a few seconds on the railing. Next she flew up to the ceiling light fixture and went inside through an opening where a frosted glass panel was missing.

They had a nest inside of the light fixture which was frustum shaped with the top being the only side that was metal and all others were glass. Each panel was approximately 12"wide at the top, 10" at the bottom and maybe 7" tall. Needless to say it was an unusually shaped birdhouse and I wonder who made the house selection. Opening to floor had absolutely zero drop distance and hole opening must have been close to 77 square inches. Somebody was in major violation of EABL birdhouse codes unless this a new contemporary version that I am unaware of.

To add to the mystic of this my friends advised that earlier in the spring while the weather was much colder they actually kept the light turned on day and night for the birds warmth while the illumination didn't appear to create a problem. They must have kept late night hours unless they stuck their heads under their wings like some birds do. Anybody have a clue on that subject?

Even though they were well out of reach from crawling, jumping and walking predators almost any flying predator had a wide open shot at them2E Maybe they thought it allowed a much wider escape route but I don't think that it would provide adequate protection for hatchlings.

My friends were selling their house the next day so I'll probably never determine the feasibility of this bird house design.

Felix Swan fdswan"at"conwaycorp.net
Conway, AR 72034-6543
Lat. 35.085, Lon. -'.414
Zone 7 & Elev. 316


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler, txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:07 AM
Subject: Re:Myths/ skunk story

... I gave cavity nesters talks yesterday to 5 sophomore English classes and one of the boys talked about getting sprayed with a skunk. His mom tied his smelly shoes to the barbed wire fence and a week later when he went to get his tennis shoes there was a bluebird sitting on eggs in one of the shoes.

Some people claim that bluebirds imprint on a certain style of nestbox and search for the "exact" style they were born in.....I can't imagine spending $100 for NIKE, air Jordan open top nestshoes......Do you think right or left nestshoes will make a difference:-)))

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas


From: Tina Phillips, cbp6"at"cornell.edu
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:55 PM
Subject: Nesting Pockets

Happy New Year! A colleague of mine is interested in getting information about the usefulness of nesting pockets. These trendy items are being sold increasingly, (particularly targeted to gardeners) and are made from woven materials. If you do a Google search on "nesting pockets" you will see dozens of links for them. While I have never used these pockets, I am guessing that they lack any insulative properties and are easy access for predators. Additionally, I am not sure how easy they would be to clean and monitor. Does anyone on this list have any first hand experience using these nesting structures? Thanks in advance,

Tina Phillips The Birdhouse Network Cornell Lab of Ornithology 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd. Ithaca, NY


From: Dottie Roseboom [mailto:rosedot"at"mtco.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: Global economy materials for nest boxes

John & Others, Thanks for your info - I'm so glad that people are interested in global economy and conservation of natural resources.  I need to replace 2 aging nestboxes in the near future, & I have noticed the ones made from recycled milk jugs.  They have a 100 year guarantee.   What do you think about them?  Has anyone else had any experience with them: insulation value?  do bluebirds accept them?    They are expensive, so I don't think that many trails will be seeing them, but perhaps golf courses, cemeteries, or private yards might find them easier to maintain than the wooden nestboxes.     Thanks.
      Dottie Roseboom
      Peoria    IL    (central) ...


From: John Schuster [mailto:wildwingco"at"earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Global economy materials for nest boxes

Dear Dottie and friends,

Sorry I'm not familiar with the recycled milk jug nest boxes (the only time I've heard of using milk jugs was for seed feeders.)

I'm puzzled why they would be so expensive??? Is it because they take thousands of plastic milk jugs reduce them to scrap and then reform them into nest boxes?

We still prefer to use 3/4 inch (or better) Con Heart Redwood lumber for Bluebird nest boxes and CDX plywood or possibly this new Birch-ply for Barn Owl and other nest boxes.

Cheers,
John Schuster


From: Dottie Roseboom [mailto:rosedot"at"mtco.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Global economy materials for nest boxes

John, Many people probably know about the recycled milk jugs "plastic" wood for decks, etc.  Very durable, can be drilled, etc.  My husband does stream restoration work & they have used this "fake" wood as fish shelters for years.   I use his scraps for various outdoor projects - great as it does not rust or rot.  However, I don't particular like the nuance of it for cavity nesters - doesn't seem "natural"  LOL.   But, any roofs made out of it would certainly not crack & split.   I don't have the website name with me - if you are interested, I could email it to you later. IMO, one reason that it's expensive is that they are marketing it as "environmentally friendly".  Those 2 words seem to add $$$.  Also, there still isn't a big enough market for mass-collection of plastics & factory production.   So far, I agree that the redwood lumber is a good way to go.
      Dottie Roseboom
      Peoria    IL    (central)

From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: plywood for nestboxes Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant Texas

The Russian made 1/2" Birch plywood in this area is made with exterior glue but is intended for interior use for cabinetry and probably will have a limited life on nestboxes. To test plywood for exterior durability you can pour very hot water over it and let it soak for several days in a pan or bucket of water. Let it dry completely in the sun and repeat the process the next week. If it is not coming apart at the edges then it should last for several years nailed together as a nestbox. One of the best exterior plywood's is call B-B Plyform. It is carried by some lumber stores who cater to firms who build concrete forms for pouring concrete retaining walls. It is 3/4" thick and has a trace of mineral oil in the wood to help it resist the high heat and moisture in curing concrete. If you have more time than money for nestboxes then using scrap interior plywood from cabinet shops will still provide you with a nestbox for 2- 4 years. I often give less durable nestboxes to people who I believe will NOT be long term monitors of the box. The cement board made by the Jim Hardie company makes good roof material for the larger cavity nester boxes. The recycled plastic deck boards make very heavy nestboxes to carry and try to mount. Americans consume on average 5 & 1/2 billion pounds of wood every single day. According to the Texas Forest service we cut about 400,000 acres of Texas forest a year and in 2000 Texas successfully replanted 116,000 acres of timber. (Land planted that the trees survived till the second year.) That is bad news if you are a chickadee or a woodpecker and great news if you are a bluebird! KK


From: John Schuster [mailto:wildwingco"at"earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: Global economy materials for nest boxes

Dear Dottie and friends,

Yes, I'm familiar with PlasTEAK (a.k.a. TECK) lumber and I've been keeping a eye on it for years. For sometime I've been wanting to install a planter box garden and because TECK lumber lasts for 75 years, it is very economical (in the long run.)

The problem with TECK lumber is that it only coming in 2"x 6", so it is not practical for nest boxes, but if they can ever figure out how to make it in 1" x 8" or 1" x 12" plus lower the cost, we Bluebirders might have something that we can work with.

I think what stumped me was the "recycled milk jugs" line on your original post as I just couldn't see using a plastic milk jug as a nest box.

Cheers and as always..
Happy Trails To You,
John Schuster


From: John Schuster [mailto:wildwingco"at"earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: plywood for nestboxes

Dear Keith and friends,

Thanks Keith about telling us about the Russian made 1/2" Birch plywood that Wild Wing Company was considering and which we will without doubt reject it's use as a suitable material for nesting boxes.

This Russian made 1/2" Birch plywood was presented to Wild Wing Company by a company in Petaluma, CA that likes to use it in their computerized precision wood cutting machine. I watched their presentation on how this computerized precision wood cutting machine works and I was very impressed.

Yes, I know it takes some of the hands on aspect out of building nest boxes, but it doesn't hurt to explore new ways of doing things, so here is how this computerized precision wood cutting machine works.

The program is loaded into the computer. Then, a full flat piece of plywood is laid down on top of a flat vacuum table. The vacuum is turned on and the plywood is sucked down tight to the vacuum table. Then the enter vacuum table and sheet of plywood are pulled into the machine where all the of router cuts are made, pilot holes are drilled, an the sections are cut, then the table is drawn, the vacuum is turn off and everything is stacked onto a pallet. You can deliver a truck load of plywood to them in the morning and by mid-afternoon pick up everything ready for assemble saving you hours of prep. time.

WOW! However, here's the catch.

The plywood has to be flat (which CDX is not) so it can be sucked down tight to the vacuum table and the plywood has to be solid with no air pockets (CDX has plenty of air pockets) because they told me that if they ran CDX in this machine it would simply EXPLODE do to the air pockets and the force of the machine. The bulk of their production is cabinet work which supports Keith's statements.

Oh well, I'll take Keith's suggesting into them and approach my vendors to see what we can come up with next.

More on this later!

Cheers and as always...
Happy Trails To You,
John Schuster


From: Dottie Roseboom [mailto:rosedot"at"mtco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: Global economy materials for nest boxes

Sorry - the link does not seem to work.  Can just go to www.bestnest.com and do a search on "rubicon", which brings up all of their products.  Also, a opened sideview of the box is shown at http://store.yahoo.net/aftonmountainwildlife/rublnebox.html . - WEBMASTER NOTE - NO LONGER IN BUSINESS - Dottie ...


Hi John, Well, I went back to some searching - found a cheaper source for bluebird boxes made from recycled plastic milk jugs by Rubicon.  BestNest sells them much cheaper than the original ones that I had been looking at.   Their ad claims that they are NABS approved and are made from 75 milk jugs.  Regularly $36.95.  On sell now for $34.95.  Rubicon guarantees them for 100 years.   Can't really tell if the walls are as thick as I like for our temperature extremes.         Evidently, the processing hardens the plastic enough to use for nestboxes.  Would like to see one in use before converting over. www.bestnest.com/bestnest/RTProduct.asp?SKU=RUB-2th100lH
      Dottie Roseboom
      Peoria    IL    (central)


From: NP551"at"aol.com [mailto:NP551"at"aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:15 AM
Subject: Alternative nest box material

My morning paper carries a Lowe's ad for a product known as Handiplank. This is a composition product made by James Hardie and comes in a variety of forms for siding, trim and such.  The particular ad features a 71/4" x 12' plank for $4.0. I'm not sure but that may be a tapered lap siding product, but this same fiber/cement composite material is used in other plank products up to 3/4 inch thick. It occurs to me that this could possibly be and ideal nest box building material. Does anyone have any more information on this material? NP Sun City Center, Fl.


From: XXX [mailto:Rebecca]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: Alternative nest box material

Fiber-cement material is popular with environmentalists. I don't know how relevant this is for BB boxes, but it is considered an ecologically correct alternative to vinyl siding. It looks like wood, holds paint better than wood, and lasts just about forever.

http://www.homestore.com/HomeGarden/HomeImprovement/Features/Summer/BeachHouseSiding.asp?poe=homestore

”Siding:

“Wood, stucco and fiber-cement are the three siding materials most often used for coastal homes. Fiber-cement, such as HandiPlank, is a fairly recent product, and its ability to stand up to humidity, rain, salt air, and high winds, is earning it rave reviews.

“"Fiber-cement, or concrete siding, as we call it, is a terrific product for beach homes," comments New Jersey builder John Goodhue. "We have found that it is totally wind-proof, which is the most important consideration at the Jersey shore. It looks like wood, requires very little maintenance and can be painted any color…”.

Also:

The James Hardie Handiplank website is http://www.jameshardie.com/homeowner.htm

Rebecca J.
Columbia,  MD


From: Shane&Emily Marcotte [mailto:marco50"at"bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: Alternative nest box material

I frame houses with this stuff as the siding.....its correctly called "hardiplank". This stuff is excellent when primed and painted and caulked. I used it on parts of my house which I built 4 yrs ago and it is looking just fine! Much better than the days of "masonite" siding! Happy Bluebirding, Shane M Watson La


From: Paula [mailto:PaulaZ"at"columbus.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 11:53 AM
Re: Alternative Nest box material

We have a 2-year old house built out of this material and from what we can see so far, it is absolutely wonderful stuff. I am talking about a people house, not a bird house. If I was handy and had been thinking, I would have saved some of the scrap to build a bird box with. The site with products and widths etc. can be found at: http://www.jameshardie.com/homeowner/prodhome/default.php The trend in the Columbus, Ohio area for past 4 years or so (since Hardiplank hit the market) is to build upscale custom homes with this material. They have used it for the past several years on the "Parade of Homes" houses that are regionally featured every year here. Our new home is actually on South Bass Island on Lake Erie. They also used this material for the Perry Monument Visitor's Center on same island. What we love about the material is: it is beautiful - actually looks better than wood in our opinion. It is a concrete composite siding that has wood grain added to it and the planks are wide - wider than standard cedar siding we have on our other house. It comes primed. When/if you paint it, it soaks up the paint. The paint is not just on surface as you have with natural wood. I cannot imagine having to repaint at all unless due to sun fading as paint chipping does not seem possible. It's not flammable. It does not warp. Things to be careful of when working with it: being a concrete composite siding, it can chip off pieces. Wear proper ventilation masks when cutting material because the concrete dust should not be inhaled. This is really dusty stuff to work with and dust if very fine. The board cross section does taper slightly so may be difficult to make a great looking nest box. I would recommend trying to get scrap from a building site if they are using the material for new construction in your area. Last spring, our yard was full of brush and scrap. We did have a fire to burn the scrap and an interesting thing happened. A killdeer made her nest amongst the charcoal from the fire and little chips of Hardiplank. It was an excellent nest as the eggs were practically invisible with that camouflage. I actually saved her "nesting" material and plan to dump it in the yard to see if they use it again. Paula Z Powell (Central) Ohio


From: Shane&Emily Marcotte [mailto:marco50"at"bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: Alternative nest box material

Yes it cost more than vinyl. and you almost have to have a trim, staple or frame gun to nail it.......it is almost impossible to nail with conventional galvonized nails! or any hand nail for that matter.......but if you or someone you know can work with it , it will make a fine siding for BB houses/nestboxes! .... Also Rebecca, I should have added that hardiplank siding does not cut well with an everyday saw blade......its to hard. Gotta use a diamond tip blade or when we do lots on a house we use a kind of "nippers" as we refer to them. They are like electric tin snips that kind of work like scissors. Guess the cons are starting to outweigh the pros. You have thinking hard about this product now. Perhaps it could be used primarily for the roof . At any rate good luck! Shane Marcotte Watson Louisiana


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 8:05 AM
Subject: using Hardi Board for nestboxes Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant.

Texas Ron Kingston and the Virginia bluebirders have been using Hardi Board for years for nestbox roofs. Since this is normally a thin material and concrete is brittle and fractures without pilot holes it would be nearly impossible to build a nestbox totally out of this material without masonry drill bits and concrete anchors. On the other hand it works very good on larger nestboxes IF you use some wood and attach the Hardi board to the wood with either nails or the special hardi board screws. I like to build wood duck nestboxes or owl boxes with 2"X12" lumber for front, back and bottom and the sides and roof from Hardi board. You could do the same with 2"x6" lumber for "Bluebird" nestboxes and use the Hardi board for the rest of the nestbox. 3/4" thick lumber with hardi board attached with nails just 3/8" from the edge just will not hold up as the cement board will end up breaking at the nail holes. Cutting Hardi Board: We have used this product for years & I bought a special electric shear to cut this many years ago and it still cuts flawlessly with NO DANGEROUS dust put out in the air. Most stores that sell hardi board also sell the shear or many will rent the shear for a day. If it is NOT painted then overtime acid rain will soften the already brittle sheets. Baseballs and golf balls will break this material occasionally on a house. Hardi Board scrap: Most lumber stores will sell or give you broken sheets of this material (or damaged, split wood boards) if you are building nestboxes for a local project. KK


From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"tds.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 8:32 AM
Re: using Hardi Board for nestboxes

Keith, et al, Is it possible to cut this HardiBoard product on a circular table saw? Is it bad for saw blades? Is it dangerous to the person doing the sawing? Bruce Burdett, SW NH


From: Shane&Emily Marcotte [mailto:marco50"at"bellsouth.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: using Hardi Board for nestboxes

It will dull a regular saw blade really quickly.........you can purchase a blade that will cut it but the blade is very expensive.The shears KK refers to are the best route if your going to be cutting lots of hardiplank. As he also states the shears produce little if any dust. When you cut it with a sawblade the dust is horrible and cant be good for you or the envirement. Also I suggest wearing gloves when working with this product as it will dry out your hands tremendously. Tough stuff though and if it doesnt get wet it seems as it will last forever. Good luck, Shane Marcotte Watson Louisiana


From: PTom [mailto:ptom"at"austin.rr.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: using Hardi Board for nestboxes

A new subdivision with hundreds of new houses near Mountain City (no mountains) has exteriors exclusively of Hardi Board, which is also called Hardi Plank. I use scrap material to create "HeatShields" (see plans on www.texasbluebirdsociety.org ).  Using a spacer to create a 1/2" air space and screws to attach it, Hardi-board goes over the nestbox. As has been mentioned, this material is brittle.  It can be "scored/etched" with a utility knife and then just broken off - as you would do to cut a piece of glass.   It comes in various widths ... some are already the correct width for my purpose.  I use over-sized pieces for the back and top to provide additional shade. I use a drill bit that's designed for Hardi Board to drill four holes in each piece and then affix it to the nestbox with long screws. Pauline Tom Mountain City (no mountains) TX South Central Texas



From: Elizabeth Zimmerman [mailto:ezdz"at"charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 8:56 PM
Subject: Nestbox insulation - wood vs plastic

Here's something I don't understand - why do we recommend using 3/4 - 1" lumber for nestboxes instead of 1/2" for insulation … when a Gilbertson or PVC box walls are so thin?  Does thin plastic insulate better?

Bet from CT


From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"tds.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: Nestbox insulation - wood vs plastic

Bet,     In my opinion, 1/2" lumber is far to thin for nestboxes. It's not very sturdy, it provides little insulation, and it warps too easily. I would much prefer at least 7?8" stock. Bruce Burdett


From: Elizabeth Zimmerman [mailto:ezdz"at"charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: Nestbox insulation - wood vs plastic

Okay, I buy the warping issue, but how does thin plastic provide any insulation? Bet



From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"tds.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Nestbox insulation - wood vs plastic

Bet,       I've never understood how thin plastic provided any insulation at all. I've never used it, so I have no experience with it.      Are there any accurate figures on the relative R values of wood versus plastic? I've never seen any. Would thin plastic make a warm enough box for winter roosting, or for chilly nights in the nesting season? In nature, these birds nest in hollow tree trunks, which are even thicker than a box made of full 1" stock.      I wouldn't dream of making a Bluebird box out of 1/2" stock. I even think that the standard 3/4" stuff is too flimsy. And in my lumber mill/store 1/2" costs more because they have to run the boards through the planer one more time. Bruce Burdett, SW NH

From: Rappaho"at"aol.com [mailto:Rappaho"at"aol.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 2:59 PM
Re: Nestbox insulation - wood vs plastic

Hi all, Plastic has no insulation power. It has no air pockets in which to trap air. Wood is not solid, it has small air pockets which trap air. Trapped air is what makes for insulation. Kathy. -----Original Message----- From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper"at"bayou.com] Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 7:37 PM To: ezdz"at"charter.net; BLUEBIRD-L"at"cornell.edu Subject: RE: Nestbox insulation - wood vs plastic This question about thin wall PVC reminds me of an article I saw on another listserve by Dick Tuttle. His loss was great the previous year with Chickadees and he felt sure it was the thin wall PVC pipe. He felt wood was the better insulator. Delhi, LA Louisiana Bayou Bluebird Society


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 9:23 AM
Re:nestbox insulation wood VS plastic Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas

Nestboxes get designed and tested in different parts of the country to fill a need for certain weather and checking conditions. Steve's PVC nestboxes are made from Sewer and Drain pipe and have walls 1/16" thick because this pipe is not designed to withstand high pressure water or air. We have been using the schedule #40 high pressure PVC pipe since 1975 in Texas that has 1/4" thick walls. As others have stated PVC pipe is dense and has little insulation qualities. On the other hand COLOR is more important on nestboxes if you want to keep inside temperatures down on nestboxes mounted in full sun. Remember Purple Martin houses made of .035" thick white aluminum one half the thickness of Sewer and Drain is perfectly safe for the birds when mounted in full sun. Aluminum conducts heat and cold 12 times more rapidly than glass so one square inch of aluminum on your window frame that connects the outside to the inside of your house without a thermal break in the aluminum will negate 12 square inches of insulated glass. In heat tests of various styles of nestboxes placed in full sun, white 1/4" thick walled PVC pipe is normally cooler than a natural wood colored nestbox. What I am trying to show is that millions of birds are raised in aluminum houses each year in nestboxes that have NO insulation value. If baby birds are dying of hypothermia in a nestbox then the adult female is to blame (or extreme weather) and NOT the nestbox style! Inside a nestbox the nest should be dry and have greatly reduced wind chill. The nest material the female chooses should insulate the eggs and young birds and she should brood them enough to maintain body heat. Think of the hundreds of millions of birds nesting in open nests in northern states during extremely rainy/cold months with no walls or roof to protect their nests at all! These birds have survived the elements for millions of years and the females with poor nestbuilding skills and poor brooding/feeding skills are supposed to lose their young so only the best will survive the next million years.KK


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 10:13 AM
Re:wood for nestboxes Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas

I touched on insulation properties of nestboxes in the last post and it would be GREAT for people on this list all over the country to join Cornell next year in using the data loggers in different styles of nestboxes. As Tina said you don't have to learn to program the data loggers as they will send them to you postage paid ready to install. This way we might be able to learn for sure if tree swallows are dying of hypothermia or something more sinister! We would know if eggs laid on an almost bare wood bottom are hotter/colder than those with a good nest under them. We could even experiment with insulated bottoms in nestboxes:-)) IF you want the ultimate high insulation R-value nestbox then go out and buy 1/2 gallon wide mouth insulated plastic thermos jugs...They are just about the perfect size for a bluebird nestbox. Drill entrance, drain and ventilation holes and mount them for the birds. You can check and clean them by unscrewing the top...Old three and five gallon plastic water coolers make great owl and wood duck nestboxes. Insulation value of wood is in direct proportion to the individual boards density. The lighter the board per square foot the higher the resistance to heat or cold traveling through the material. Ebony wood sinks in water and has little R-value. Balsa wood and Paulownia are the two lightest weight commercial woods in widespread use in the world. Paulownia weights twice as much as Balsa wood but has twice the bursting strength so a half thickness of Paulownia can be used to get the same weight to strength ratio of Balsa Wood. A custom built, 12 foot long Balsa wood speed boat coated with fiberglass will weight less than 112 pounds. Paulownia wood on average is 1/2 the weight of oak wood it is 40% lighter than yellow pine and has double the insulation R-value of yellow pine per inch of thickness. On page 58 of The Bluebird Monitor's Guide is a picture of Jack Finch with a Paulownia Elongata tree that is 6 years old. He is harvesting 10 year old trees that he planted and building nestboxes from them and you can order a lightweight Paulownia bluebird nestbox that I guarantee will NEVER have a door on the box that sticks! I have one of Jack's trees that at three years old was 40 feet tall, 30 feet wide with a 12" diameter trunk "at" 54" off the ground and is still growing at a rate of 3/4" in diameter a month. All wood needs to be COMPLETELY sealed on all sides and especially the ends to maintain R-value. Wood will soak up water during rains and lose the insulation value just like your ski suit will if you get it soaked. We have a local OSB (orchestrated strand board/plywood) plant (Canadian owned) that is producing 4 million square feet of 7/16" thick boards a day! This is 35,000 acres covered up every year with resin coated wood chips. How many trees do they cut in a year? KK


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper"at"bayou.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 2:06 PM
RE: nestbox insulation wood VS plastic

Why do people that use the plastic containers or jugs for Prothonotary Warblers use dark brown on the outside and black on the inside? Even though they place them in the shade, looks like that would still be hotter. We tried using half a plastic tank cut and turned upside down for a dog house and it was so hot they couldn't stand it. We scratched that idea. It was unbearable. I don't like plastic anything for wildlife or animals to live in. Evelyn


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper"at"bayou.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 11:22 AM
Subject: Plastic Vs. Wood

Below is an excerpt from a post to the Ohio Listserve that Dick Tuttle wrote. Note that he used 1/8" THIN Wall. He observed that Chickadees that nested in wooden nextboxes nearby were more successful. This led him to believe the thin wall PVC is not as good especially in that kind of severe weather. Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA Louisiana Bayou Bluebird Society

"The timing of 2003's severe weather is reflected in the chickadees' struggle to raise hatchlings to fledge. Chickadees are excellent providers once eggs hatch; they routinely fledge over 90% of their hatched eggs if they hatch, they will fly. Nonetheless, last season saw frantic parents lose one of every four young. Is there more to this story than bad weather? Perhaps, and since a scientific protocol had not been followed, I have to go with my "gut feeling" for what might be wrong. The nest tubes that I originally designed for Prothonotary Warblers, and later modified for chickadees, might be too ventilated with walls too thin to adequately hold heat. The nest chambers are made of thin-walled (1/8") PVC drainpipe, and are ventilated with two large slots under their wooden roofs. Eight of nine nest failures took place in these nest tubes. In contrast, all four chickadee nest attempts at the Methodist Theological School and Perkins Observatory were successful in wooden nest boxes with minimum ventilation. Is wood good, and plastic bad? Possibly."


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: Tin Cans As Bird Homes

Back in the summer, we had discussion on the List about people providing tin cans as homes for the birds. There was overwhelming voiced opinion against it. I think about two or three people thought it was o.k. I remember KK compared it to sitting in a hot car all day. I am writing this to show you how we think on the Bluebird List and how some other folks think. I received a brochure from Rodale Books promoting a book by Don and Lillian Stokes and one thing really caught my eyes. It said on a certain page that tin soup cans were Carolina Wren's dream homes! I could not help but wonder if they consider the extreme heat in the southern part of the country and to me all birds would suffer the same from the heat. I would not provide a tin can for the Bluebirds. (or any bird) To me, it is just too bad that more people will read that information than our opinions about tin cans as homes for the birds! Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA


From: Lawrence Herbert [mailto:lherbert "at"4state.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:44 PM
Subject: tin cans

Purple Martins use our "tin cans" regularly. Perhaps they are, for the most part, in and out by the time the baking hot weather begins. Usually single brooded per Colin Harrison, 1978, in "Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of N. A. Birds." Good birding, Larry H. Joplin MO.


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder "at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:42 AM
Subject: Re:tin cans Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant Texas

Carolina Wrens make a nest that fits perfectly inside a one gallon paint can. These paint cans are about 7" in diameter and have a floor space of over 38 square inches compared to a Gilwood nestbox at around 14 square inches or 12 inches or so for a 4" PVC nestbox. "Tin can nestboxes" should NOT be placed in full sun in southern states or anywhere the temperature will reach the low 90's during nesting season. Carolina Wrens prefer to nest inside open buildings like carports, barns or abandoned houses with open windows. You can place empty paint buckets on their sides in various places in your carport to attract these wrens and the "tin can" will remain as cool as the inside of your garage. New paint cans are often made out of a heavy duty plastic. If these "tin cans" are painted white why would they be any hotter than the Plastic gourds sold for Purple Martin houses? Why would a white "tin can" be any hotter than a thin sheet metal Purple Martin house? More heat tests of nestboxes anyone? Back in the early 1970's from the Rocky Mountains of Colorado up into Banff Canada there were metal nestboxes installed on metal poles 6 feet or more above the ground. They were about the size of a paint can and came with two entrance holes stamped in them. You could either use the small 1&1/4" hole or the larger 1&9/16" hole by removing a plastic plug. They had a metal bottom and some had wood tops some metal tops. They were painted a bright orange color. They had writing on two sides of the nestbox. On one side it told that this was a multi use nestbox for various cavity nesters. On the other side it had a warning Message telling people that there were underground utilities near this spot and to call an 800 number before digging or excavating. In 2002 I was back up there in this area of Canada and these "tin can" nestboxes are still in use after more than 25 years. Someone at the "warning sign" company designed this nestbox using no more metal or paint than normal warning signs and they made and installed them by the thousands. We probably should look at designing a better type of nestbox that could be used as "dual use" warning or posted signs for major companies to use along their fence lines. KK


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:56 AM
RE: negative vibes circulating around the tin can subject

We are trying to be positive. For the birds. To do what is best. Lots of misinformation is spread and needs to be corrected. I don't think you have the right opinion of us if you think we are "know it alls", because we learn something new all the time. I can tell you for sure, most everything I write about is from EXPERIENCE and it is for my area of the USA, not other places. Also, we once tried a half plastic tank cut and turned upside down for a dog house and it was so hot in the shade they could not stay in it. I poked my head in the door of it and could not breathe. This is a discussion forum and not one to stifle any opinion or experience. Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:59 AM
RE: tin cans

Keith, I see you mention Colorado. I don't know just how hot it gets there in the summer, but I would think that is not like our summers. I think that has more to do with what we choose than anything. Some people just do not bring that into consideration when they are recommending things. I see you have though. Evelyn


From: Kenny Kleinpeter [mailto:kpkmajk "at"cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:16 AM
RE: tin cans

While metal is used in a variety of martin housing, the difference is that they are ventilated. Having small holes in at least two directions allows for good airflow even on those hot, sultry summer days when high temperatures increase clutch failures. While airflow doesn't lower the temperature, it increases the transpiration rate of the birds so that they can better release their internal heat -- sort of like a windchill factor (I like to call it their comfort factor). So, a can with one hole in it is different than a properly ventilated martin house -- especially late in the season. I think nestboxes should have ventilation holes that can be opened only in the summer -- at least down here in LA. I certainly think the ventilation should be closed off for boxes used as winter roosts.


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:15 AM
RE: negative vibes circulating around the tin can subject

"Cardboard, plastic jugs, milk cartons and large tin cans provide little insulation (especially against heat) so should not be used." Above is a sentence from the NABS Fact Sheets. It is on the one "Questions Most Frequently Asked". LBBS believes "Education Is The Key" and we should not take our responsibilities lightly when we set out to raise any kinds of birds. It is harder to educate some than others, but for the most part, it is a joy. Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA


From: jwick "at"tds.net [mailto:jwick "at"tds.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:34 AM
Re: negative vibes circulating around the tin can subject

This is true, but we also need to do our best NOT do more damage than good when it comes to providing SAFE nesting opportunities for bluebirds. I continue to try my best to follow these 3 rules with regard to my bluebirding and bluebird banding activities: Rule #1: Do no harm. Rule #2: Expect the unexpected. Rule #3: Never say "Never." Thus far, these 3 rules have served me well for nearly 25 years. ... Ann Wick Black Earth, WI


From: mrtony8 [mailto:mrtony8 "at"cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: negative vibes circulating around the tin can subject

my 2 cents worth wasn't asked for, but here it is any way. If anyone thinks a tin can is a safe haven for ANY bird, they are just plain WRONG!! my goodness, you could not get away with that here in nw florida in January, let alone during the "baking season: (as my friend Evelyn so aptly described it). No milk cartons, no cans, not even a proper box without some form of insulation. I use a double roofed box with 1/2" insulation between the roofs and it still gets hot in there. I am not a know it all, jsut a guy who cares very much about birds, all birds, but especialy the ones I try very hard to help out, Eastern Bluebirds, and others who use our boxes as well. Phil Bery now of Pensacola, Florida


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:08 PM
RE: negative vibes circulating around the tin can subject

I sure know a lot more than I did 7 years ago and I have dug for information, learned the hard way, had great advice from this list and never stop learning. Last season was my second to use the solar screen (something new I learned two seasons ago). On the second and third cycle, all my nestboxes look like they have their head scarves on. It helps the heat situation tremendously. There were no deaths on those cycles this year. Believe me, if I think something is detrimental to the birds, I will speak my mind regardless of the label some come out with. ... Evelyn


From: Kenny Kleinpeter [mailto:kpkmajk "at"cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 2:52 PM
RE: tin cans

Help me out here, Keith; by referencing this corporate nestbox program are you saying that erecting thousands of unmonitored nestboxes is a good idea? I've always heard (and believed) that an unmonitored nestbox is worse than no nestbox at all. It seems that the failure rates of these boxes would be horrible. You might say that these thousands of boxes are predator feeding stations rather than nestboxes. Thanks, Kenny Kleinpeter Baton Rouge, LA


From: Torrey [mailto:torrey_canyon "at"yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:54 PM
Subject: negative vibes

Does this subject really warrant so much mail? & so much of it kinda negative? Without seeing the "tin can" (or even an experimental box), I cannot make judgements about its suitability. Does it have adequate ventilation? Can it be fitted with a predator guard? Can it be easily checked & cleaned out? Will it be easy to carry out to the trail to mount? How long will it last? This list goes out to people from sub-tropical Florida to sub-arctic Canada. Things that work well at one extreme will likely not work at the other. I can accept that a coffee-type can might be perfectly acceptable somewhere, but I wouldn't use one. Drilling ventilation holes might leave sharp edges, the can would rust quicker than a wooden box would deteriorate, & it gets too hot here in the summer (most of my box locations are in full sun). Frankly, this whole discussion reminds me of this past election season. Shouldn't we be more mature than the politicians? Torrey Moss Kalamazoo Nature Center Kalamazoo, MI


From: Lawrence Herbert [mailto:lherbert "at"4state.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:03 PM
Subject: recycling the tin cans

On my post of 11-22-04 I stated that Purple Martins use our "tin cans" regularly..." What I was saying, and may have been misunderstood, is that PUMA use martin houses all across the Midwest successfully. I also stated that PUMA are, for the most part, single brooded. I thought perhaps they fledge quite often at times because the really hot weather hasn't arrived yet. We don't have any tin cans laying around out back, or a Purple Martin house either, for that matter. But, if we did, the desirable song birds are welcome to have at it. Regarding temperature: Back in June, 1984, I found the temperature on the inside of a bluebird house to be the same as the temp. on the shade side of the nesting box. It was an extremely warm day, 100 F., as I recall. I realize that there was little "breeze" on the inside of the nesting site, but the actual temp. was the same nonetheless. (The EABL fledged successfully). Wish you all a nice Thanksgiving, Good birding, Larry H. Joplin MO.


From: Dottie Roseboom [mailto:rosedot "at"mtco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:54 PM
Re:tin cans

Keith, this summer, we had a lovely Carolina Wren family use a 5 gallon can laying on its side, on a high shelf in our barn. She built her nest quite late in the WINTER, so the barn at that time provided shelter from cold, spring rains. Her babies fledged, while many of the bluebirds were just beginning to build nests. And you're so right about how wrens enjoy larger floor spaces. I was really hoping that she'd build the second nest in the barn, but guess that the barn swallows were too noisy. Even on our 95 degree summer days, metal buckets remain fairly cool in the barn. Next spring, an entire wall of empty buckets (mostly plastic) will be awaiting her arrival. Dottie Roseboom Peoria IL (central - zone 5)



Dottie, Hickory Hollow, Brown County, Indiana
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:04 PM
Subject: Aluminum Martin Housing

Those aluminum Martin houses are death traps. And I know PMCA does sell them on their web site--or at least they used to. I haven't looked lately. I bought one not knowing they were death traps. When I found out, I had my husband modify it from a 12 compartment to a 6 compartment. This gave the birds more room and also made it cooler. Actually, I have it down now and not using it. I went to all gourds. Dottie, Hickory Hollow Brown County, Indiana (50 miles south of Indianapolis) Lat: 39.371N Lon: 86.261W Zone 5 Elevation: 680 ft From: Kenny Kleinpeter


[mailto:kpkmajk "at"cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:53 PM
RE: Aluminum Martin Housing

Now, Dottie you know I love you even if we ever disagree. :-) I don't think aluminum housing is the same as "tin cans." I love aluminum martin houses -- but I do convert them to double compartments like you said -- in fact, I have some converted to triple compartment but double compartments are all that the birds really utilize. The extra airspace just allows that much more ventilation -- the key to any box (martin, bluebird or otherwise) in hot weather. I've checked temperatures in gourds and aluminum houses and found no difference! Sometimes we forget that birds' temps run about 103 F. so, what we call uncomfortable may be just right to them. I think mortality from overheating starts to occur at about 110 F. As you alluded to, PMCA cares more about money than martins. Its director, Jamie Hill used to work for Trio Manufacturing, the largest producer of aluminum housing. He actually manufactures his own plastic gourds that he sells to his own "not-for-profit" corporation. He has finally disclosed the arms-length relationship in the last couple of tax returns for PMCA, I'm happy to say. :-) Aluminum housing -- like any housing are death traps if not properly managed. I find their adaptability, accessibility and over manageability to be superior over any other housing out there.


From: Dottie, Hickory Hollow, Brown County, Indiana [mailto:yumyumkatts "at"voyager.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:15 PM
Re: Aluminum Martin Housing

I understand that a group of PM landlords went to Trio Manufacturing and asked them to change their dies in order to make the compartments bigger. But they wouldn't. Cost too much money. Thanks for the info on Mr. Hill. I didn't know he worked for Trio. Dottie, Hickory Hollow Brown County, Indiana


From: Dick Stauffer [mailto:sapl "at"agt.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: tin cans

Hi all: I live & have a nestbox trail in Central Alberta approx 60 miles from Banff. The tin cans that mark the underground utilities are open top & bottom. One used to be able to order from the utility company a bottom, top & meshing that went around the inside (allowing the birds to climb out). The program was called fur & feathers. This was discontinued at least 6-8 years ago. I know of only 1 of these containers that is used by a fellow nestbox monitor. There are not (to my knowledge) thousands of these used as nest sites. Dick Stauffer


From: JOHN & BARBARA SIBIO [mailto:jsibio "at"comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:46 PM
Re: Hawk hanging around feeders?

Hi Horace and List, I had a problem a couple of years ago with a juvenile sharp-shinned hawk that was stalking my feeders. Fortunately, the feeders weren't close to my bluebird nestbox, but the hawk took several finches off the feeder, and a couple right out of the air, too! He/she would perch on the fence about nine feet from the feeder, and just wait. Whenever I spotted it there, I would go frighten it off banging pot lids; one time I chased it with a broom, like a lunatic! It was fearless, but finally matured and left the area. It just seemed to hang around because it was young, and it was roosting under my neighbors' eaves till the fall. Hopefully the hawk at your friend's feeders will move on, also. You're right, it's just nature, but we do all we can to protect "our" birds! Barbara in Cloverdale, CA



From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder "at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:04 AM
Subject: Re:tin cans/more info

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
The Rocky Mountain warning sign "tin can nestboxes" are installed by the utility companies with a bottom but NO top to the nestbox. Cold temperatures in the northern states kill as many birds as heat in the southern states.
I'll bet with little effort you can create a "tin can" nestbox that is better thermally protected than the average wood nestbox sold at Wal-Mart!

The instructions on the warning sign partial nestbox tell how to install or get a top and how to maintain the completed nestbox as I recall. We only checked a handful of completed nestboxes as they are well off of the roads and VERY few landowners are taking advantage of possible free nestboxes and we did not see any with current nests. About the same number of people you see putting up nestboxes of their own when you drive across the country were fixing up these free nestboxes!

These commercial tin can nestboxes have a stamped entrance hole that is also "rolled" inward to create a non sharp edge to the sheetmetal. The trouble with making a homemade tin can nestbox is where to put the entrance hole so that it will NOT be sharp! You would almost need to use a double deep medium can like the half gallon V-8 juice comes in and then cut out one end and replace it with wood with the entrance hole in the wood and then mount/hang the can sideways.

When we moved to Mt. Pleasant in 1964 there was a high school teacher who had the students save the tin cans that coffee comes in the whole school year and then in April the FFA boys would convert these into "bluebird"
houses and nail them up all over the area. They cut an entrance hole in the plastic lid and nailed them up in various locations. This was a project that had been on going for many years!

This was probably the reason I saw my first bluebird the first day I was in Texas! While the FFA boys were installing hundreds of "tin cans" I was installing hundreds of birdhouse gourds each year. Gourds and tin cans ARE both easy for predators to raid.

I still found rusty "tin cans" being used by bluebirds well into the 80's.
The plastic lids fell off early and then the bluebirds simply entered the large round hole and nested against the back of the can. As I recall one can was mounted nailed to the very top of a wood fence post right under a large shady oak tree at a good fishing hole. This was used for at least four years straight. Another can was nailed to a power pole with a shade roof over it made out of a 1X12" board. Another was mounted to a tree trunk. This was the
1x8 version of the tin can nestbox. You took two pieces of 1x8" lumber and nailed it in an L-configuration. You screwed the tin can in this L to the back board and the top board with the can being the structural brace. By nailing the L-brace nestbox to a pole or barn or tree you now had a tin can nestbox that was securely mounted and also now shaded with wood.

This type tin can nestbox also appears in many of the pre World War II books on how to build nestboxes. Gallon cans were recommended to be attached to barns under the eaves during this period for Robins, Phoebe's, Barn Swallows, House wrens ETC to nest on top of or inside of.

We sometimes get really caught up in protecting OUR bluebirds from ALL predators! If a raccoon does not eat a nestbox full of bluebirds tonight does that mean it will NOT eat ANY OTHER birds! An active raccoon that weighs 25 pounds will eat more protein every night than an inactive 25 pound yard dog! Is a meal of bluebirds more valuable than a Whooping Crane egg or a nest full of baby Grasshopper Sparrows?

If we are losing as many bluebirds in boxes mounted to smooth metal poles protected with grease, guards, snake traps and ant and blowfly protection then how many species of birds are being eaten that nest in the grass, vines, bushes and small trees in our fields? Instead of bluebirds tonight maybe the fox's next meal will be a ground nesting Whip-poor-will or Kill Deer....KK


From: charlene anchor [mailto:charleneanchor "at"msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:25 AM
Subject: OT: information and misinformation

One thing I will be thankful for this Thanksgiving is Bluebird-L. Reading it has been helpful and an education for me. Being able to read all the discussions, varied viewpoints and input from people all over the continent is something you can't find in books. The discussion about "tin cans" may have gone on for awhile but where else would you finally get input from someone in Albert, Canada who has seen them in use? Over and over again in our emails it is obvious that geographic locations greatly affect what we should or shouldn't do to help the birds. I am also disappointed that information that is given out by organizations does not always seem to be correct or in the best interest of the birds. Our local FPD manages a golf course which has been certified as being managed for wildlife, much to their credit. But recently in looking the golf course over, I was surprised to see some of the boxes attached low on tree trunks. When I asked them about it they said they were just following the recommendations given to them by AUDUBON!! It's not the FPD's fault if they have put up boxes which are not as safe as they could be. They were just innocently following the instructions given them. With all the information out there, and not all of it correct, it does take some sorting and searching to learn what is correct for each person's particular situation. Bluebird-L gives us that forum for discovery and an opportunity to learn from many people with a wide range of experiences. Thanks to everyone! Charlene Anchor, EC Illinois


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:02 AM
RE: information and misinformation

Well, many thanks to you Charlene! Your post makes it worth some of us being called "know it alls" by a certain lister and also by one that grumbled about too many posts!! Also, enduring some "nasty" private e-mails. You know, I commented about the video put out by Don and Lillian Stokes, "The Basics Of Bluebirding" where they show a man looking into a nestbox that is on a tree trunk. After all my efforts to explain that is a "no, no", I had to explain again at presentations that some people in different states do put them there. But, for the life of me, I can't believe they do not have ANY climbing predators. The dialogue about "tin cans" was opened Monday morning by me and so what if it takes a couple of days? Some people do not read their mail as fast as others. I posted a lot, but am sure I would not have if we had had more courtesy shown to us. This can that I read that was recommended was a soup can. Just any size I suppose. I have not changed my position on it. I am certainly glad you feel this discussion helped you! That is what we are all about. Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:15 AM
RE: tin cans/more info

Keith, our mission statement says we support ALL native cavity nesters. I cherish all the other little birds that nest on my trail in and around my place. We are not just talking about Bluebirds here. I would not recommend the tin can or the thin Wal-Mart nestbox that you are talking about. I am glad that we have come as far as we have to improve our efforts in helping our wildlife. I preach that there is a better way and why not do it? I know a person that has so many nestboxes on his trail he can only monitor once a month. There is no way he can afford guards for all of them. His fledging rate (Bluebirds) this year was less than 50%. To me, I had rather do it on a smaller scale and fledge more. I would shudder to think that I was raising snake and other predator food, when with less to care for, I could do better. There is nothing more heartwarming to me and my daughter, Sheryl Bassi, who helps me at presentations when we are before a group that really appreciates what we are saying and wants to get all the help they can. We both come away "just glowing". Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA


From: Larry A Broadbent [mailto:rockets "at"mnsi.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:32 PM
Re: tin cans/more info

Dear List members, Cornell Lab of Ornithology is considered by most professional Ornithologist and serious birders, to be the leading / premiere center for Scientific Bird Study and Bird Biology in the World. I whole heartedly agree with this position. However on their the Bird House Network (TBN), there is one set of plans that Really disturbs me and the people here in Canada that are working on the Prothonotary Warbler recovery team. That issue is TBN's Prothonotary Warbler Milk Carton Plans. Case in point: The following link on the Bird House Network (TBN) has these plans for: Prothonotary Warbler Milk Carton Plans http://birds.cornell.edu/birdhouse/bhbasics/prowplans.html These plans and recommendations for using plastic milk cartons ( basically duck taped to trees) should be totally removed. They are an abomination to the proper conservation for the Prothonotary Warblers. The Prothonotary Warblers are on Canada's Extreme Endangered Species List. There are less than 20 pairs of Prothonotary Warblers in all of Canada. And they only nest in southern Ontario. (most of the nesting pairs within a hours drive or less from where I live). Please, IF you feel the same way as I do about NOT using plastic milk cartons, would you email Cornell Lab of Ornithology & TBN and ask them to remove these http://birds.cornell.edu/birdhouse/bhbasics/prowplans.html abomination plans for the Prothonotay Warblers? Evelyn Cooper is right on the mark with the statement, "our mission statement says we support ALL native cavity nesters". I agree 100%. Evelyn Cooper also commented about the video put out by Don and Lillian Stokes, "The Basics Of Bluebirding" where they show a man looking into a nestbox that is on a tree trunk. After all her efforts to explain that is a "no, no", she had to explain again at presentations that some people in different states do put them there. But, for the life of me, I can't believe they do not have ANY climbing predators. Don & Lillian Stokes should NEVER have included video footage of a Bluebird nestbox mounted on a tree. That sets a Bad example for novices / newbees to Bluebirding & Cavity nesting birds. They think it must be OK. After all, don't real cavity nesting birds nest in cavities / holes in real trees? Yes they do. But this issue is conservation of cavity nesting birds. How to increase the numbers of successful nestings and increase the number of fledglings for which ever species of Bluebird or cavity nesting bird we are after. This is accomplished by mounting well designed and constructed wood nestboxes, mounted to metal steel / galvanized or EMT Poles. NOT wood fence poles or wood 2 x 2's! Metal poles should be equipped with some type of Predator baffle and or grease to deter climbing predators. Garry Springer of Real Bird Homes.com has also experimented with mounting the majority of his Bluebird nestboxes at heights of 8 to 10 feet. He has found that this height puts the nestbox above the scent trail for most ground climbing predators. And he has found that he gets more species of cavity nesting birds, such as Nuthatches, and Red Headed Woodpeckers using his Chalet Bluebird nestboxes. Gary has also observerd that Bluebirds in his area of Georgia will automatically take one of his 8 to 10 foot mounted Bluebird nestboxes over one of his that is mounted at 5'. Yes, it requires a good steep ladder to monitor, but the results are Very Good. I am not recommending that one mounts all his/her Bluebird nestboxes at these higher heights. But you should consider possible a few for your trails. I personally will be including a significant number of 8 to 10 foot mounted nest for the 2005 nesting season, here in Ontario. I'm very interested in getting as many Flycatchers, Nuthatches, and Woodpeckers to nest as I can. Remember, its primarily the Woodpeckers that make the natural holes in trees that all the other cavity nesting birds compete for nest sites. Regards, Larry A Broadbent Chatham, ON



From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd "at"tds.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: Re:tin cans/more info

I, for one, welcome all these exchanges about tin cans as bird-houses.
The conversation doesn't do any harm.
However, the opinions and the experiences I've read on this List convince me that tin cans aren't a very good idea where I am, and I would never consider using them. My impression is that they potentially do more harm than good. Never having tried them, I can report no experience with them.
Bruce Burdett



From: Kenny Kleinpeter [mailto:kpkmajk "at"cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: tin cans/more info

Your first paragraph seems to imply that tin cans, though sub-standard are as good as anything Wal-Mart sells so, go ahead and use them anyway. I have a big problem with using anything Wal-Mart sells as the de facto standard.
Wal-Mart doesn't give a rat's ear about bluebirds -- they care about how cheap they can buy and sell. In fact, Wal-Mart is synonymous with garbage.

Your second paragraph seems to contradict what you said in yesterday's post.
Just to keep the record straight, yesterday you said that the pipeline company's tin can trail were "still in use after more than 25 years." Today you're saying that very few are used. Well, which is it?!

Your third paragraph talks about all the work that would be involved in bringing a tin can up to acceptable standards by using, of all things, wood.
I would suggest recycling your tin cans and using wood to build nestboxes in the first place.

1964 was a long time ago -- nailing tin cans to trees may have been better for bluebirds than nothing but today, you would think we know better than to lure and trick "our" bluebirds into being raccoon food. Nailing tin cans to trees is by all credible standards, unacceptable whether you think it was
the reason you saw your first Texas bluebird or not.

You're darn tootin' when you say that I get caught up in protecting "my"
bluebirds from predators. There's no shortage of raccoons in my neck of the woods and I consider it horribly unethical to take a stressed species like bluebirds and lure them into unprotected housing just to make life easier for an over-weight raccoon. All the raccoons I know go for the garbage cans long before searching out some Whooping Crane egg. Give me a break, please!

I'm afraid that I provide adequate nesting sites to bluebirds so that there will be more bluebirds -- not to provide food for the wonderful snakes, coons and hawks in the world. I think your attitude reflects your being a naturalist and that's fine and worthy of respect. I'm a dismal failure as a naturalist -- I just have a soft spot in my heart for secondary cavity nesters since we humans (naturalists and otherwise) have nearly wiped out any nesting opportunities they may have of continuing their species.

This should be the wrong place to suggest nailing tin cans to trees. :-/

Respectfully,

Kenny Kleinpeter
Baton Rouge, LA


From: charlene anchor [mailto:charleneanchor "at"msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: more tin can observations

I read Keith's discussion about tin cans in an historical perspective and found it interesting. I didn't think he was recommending that we all run out and put up tin cans as nest boxes. So far, from what I've read on Bluebird-L, I wouldn't agree with doing that. It sounds like there would only be limited situations in which it would work. So why risk it? Progress has been made since people first started putting out nest boxes, tin cans, gourds or what have you, and there are many generations of nest boxes to choose from which makes the topic more confusing. We now have a Cornell Lab studying these matters, there is research of all kinds being done on birds and there is the experience of many people to help someone make better choices and learn from. If we put up a nest box it only makes sense to put up the best one in the manner in which it will be most successful. Otherwise, why waste one's time and effort in doing it? And the reality of nature is a cruel one. It is a constant battle for survival. I don't hate the house wren, the house sparrow, the starling, the snake or various mammals who eat bluebirds, eggs or other birds. They are just doing what they need to do to survive. But I do hate the fact that it happens! I want to protect the boxes and birds that I am trying to help, in the best way possible, whatever that takes. We can't protect everything - only the things we are working with. Charlene Anchor, EC Illinois


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:39 PM
RE: more tin can observations

Charlene, some of Keith's post did seem to have a historical perspective, but it did come across to me that if it worked then, it could work now. Also, to go to the trouble to make a tin can as good as a thin wall nestbox purchased at Wal-Mart sounded like he promoted that. He also stated that he thought we should see if we could get utility companies to make better nestboxes and put them out here like up north. Well, I had problem about the guards and monitoring of such nestboxes and if they would still be tin and in the sun. One positive thing I read and I think it was in his first post was not to put them in the hot sun. About three or four years ago, we had drought and heat that sent the index up to 120. This went on all summer long. My whole yard of beautiful St. Augustine grass was brown, even that I watered. Can you just imagine how hot it would be in a tin can even in the shade on days like that? It was terrible. We have really done a number on our cavity nesters as for habitat and we should do the best we can by them. Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA



From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder "at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: more historical/hysterical on tin cans and predators :-))

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
The warning sign "tin can" nestboxes seems to have spanned more than 20 years from at least 1974 when I saw them for the first time in the Rocky mountains of Colorado till the mid 1990's in Canada. This was a TREMENDOUS investment in time and $ for some utility companies! The Canadian Fur and Feathers program was NOT putting up these boxes at Pikes Peak and outside Glacier National Park or in the wilds of Wyoming! These warning sign nestboxes were installed along communication or pipe lines that spanned entire states! Just because Fur and Feathers is still not buying them does not mean a company is still not producing this warning sign.

Name ANY non bird related corporation in the USA or Canada other than the Bluebird School Bus Company that continues to help Jack Finch in Bailey North Carolina with annual donations to the cavity nesters for more than 20 years! This shows that we squandered 20 years of effort because of lack of results or lack of information or lack of input or lack of participation!
These are nestboxes that with a little more engineering can last fifty years. In the southern states three separate timber/paper/pulp companies continue to crank out waxed cardboard nestboxes that are approaching 1 million in number of about four different styles now. There will always be someone making thousands of bad nestbox styles or placing good nestboxes in bad areas or locations.

...

Now imagine with 10,000 people per county killing/eating every predator/competitor in the area for 130 years and then if you began installing 300 nestboxes scattered all over a very large very rural area EVERY year that in about 10 years you were still having about 3,000 old nestboxes in addition to all of the woodpecker cavities if you would not see more cavity nesters!

Pull up national maps of Christmas Bird Counts and Breeding Bird Survey's of the 60's 70's 80's ETC and you can see exactly where major nestbox installations were 20 years earlier!

Spin forward in time till today and you won't see a gun in a rack in a single pickup in our county. Few people still eat coon or possum's and bluebirds don't sleep very well at night in any nestbox. If you read The Bluebird Monitor's Guide it tells how to save your bluebirds and other cavity nesters from predators, heat and insects better than any other bluebird book. It tells about the very latest techniques in nestbox styles and the best ideas that still worked at the time of printing.

I try to get up every morning and in a hour or two answer personal posts and try to put together about four good thought provoking posts a week about the past history or the possible impacts or the future of bluebirding to the list before I head off to work. When a post stirs up passionate responses from Canada to Florida, New York to California then the list is better for it!

I watched Animal Planet this weekend and they showed a nice film clip of a family of raccoons running up a smooth steel rod Shepard's hook type pole to eat sunflower seeds out of a bird feeder. In the early 80's 4" diameter PVC pipe worked for stopping coons, in the late 80's the PVC failed. Switching to 6" diameter PVC worked for a few more years then failed. In the 80's 24"
diameter wide tapered sheet metal guards worked against coons. In the late 80's it was increased to 30" in the 90's to 36" diameter. 1/2" steel conduit waxed and steel wooled smooth stopped coons in the early 90's a few years ago Steve Eno's group in Nebraska filmed coons RUNNING up this type waxed pole.

Just remember we REALLY do LOVE each other on this list at ALL times! What works GREAT today probably won't last our lifetime. The predator species we stop today will be replaced with another species tomorrow. What I write about this week we will all forget next month.

If you build two nestboxes every night there will be another 700 + nestboxes in your county next year! If you put them up correctly on the best pole, in the best location, in the best area for bluebirds and make sure that it is on someone else's land and you teach 700 people how to do this hobby correctly it will help immensely!

It will help the bluebirds if we get everyone to eat coon all next year AND for Thanksgiving instead of the 267 million turkeys! KK


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: more historical/hysterical on tin cans and predators :-))

You talk about companies that produce these bad nestboxes and maybe sometimes we have to get a little on the hysterical side to get SOMEBODY'S attention!!! Many of us think "tin cans" are in this category. In this study that David Fox did in South LA., he talked about some of these cardboard nestboxes being torn completely apart by predators. Many people are not educated still about the perils of bad and good nestboxes. It is a struggle to get the Message out. Any of us, especially in leadership positions, should be careful how we come across in our teaching and recommending things. I personally think it is cruel to wildlife to put up something for them that endangers their life or their reproducing of their species. ... Evelyn


From: Lawrence Herbert [mailto:lherbert "at"4state.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:06 PM
Subject: milk cartons

...however the directions do say to place them on a tree standing in the water to reduce predators and that if they're strapped to a tree on land then mount them on a pole with a predator guard... Good birding, Larry H. Joplin MO.


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:15 PM
Subject: RE: milk cartons

Do you have any snakes in water like we do that can crawl up the tree? They are known to do it. Those milk cartons are LA by the thousands and on land with no predator guards. I have posted to another list serve urging them to use them and they think I am a nutty Bluebird Lady. Evelyn


From: Evelyn Cooper [mailto:emcooper "at"bayou.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:43 PM
RE: milk cartons

I meant I urged the people to use the predator guards. I also meant people IN LA use the milk cartons for nestboxes by the thousands. Some people in LA do use wooden nestboxes for them. They nest on the Ouachita River in Monroe about 35 miles west of me. One of our members has them nest close to the levee there in a wooden nestbox. Also, there is a man in South LA that does studies with PW's and with different types of nesting boxes and he states that the plastic jug is hotter than the wood and the aluminum is as cool as the wood. I thought I had saved it, but I cannot find it. Why can't people use wood for these little birds like they do the Bluebirds? Evelyn Cooper Delhi, LA

 



From: Paula [mailto:PaulaZ "at"columbus.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:33 AM
Subject: The Hole Story

Well, I have been reading all the posts about tin cans and milk jugs and it is all very interesting.

Regardless of our best efforts, we are bound to lose some birds to predators, weather, disease, etc. I think as bluebirders, though, we should try to give the native nesters our BEST efforts. Is a nesting site adequate or is it best practice? Why settle for 50% fledge rates with adequate or substandard setups when you could easily have 80 to 90% fledge rates with best practice setups?

If we put a 1 1/2" hole out there, EABL and other native nesters may enter it and try to nest. We have heard sad tales on this list of birds flying into downspouts or open PVC pipe and then getting stuck and dying because they had to explore that hole. Regardless of the material the hole goes into, the birds will explore it and one of them is bound to nest in there.
I think we have a responsibility to put the hole in the material and into the size cavity that ensures the bird's best chance for success (how's that for a mission statement?). We should then mount that hole as safely as possible to keep predation to a minimum. That is the "hole" story as I see it.

Now, for the "whole" story. I believe that our best practice is much better than nature provides. Natural cavities are easily raided by predators. Are substandard setups with no monitoring better than nature provides?
Something to ponder because many of them probably are, but it is certainly nothing for bluebirders to promote IMO. As I write this, there is a flock of about 200 EUST "calling" in my backyard. They are a frightening reminder of what man has done to our environment. These nonnative birds monopolize many of the natural cavities that our birds need to survive. We also continually remove many of these natural cavities by cutting down dead trees and developing the land. Since we have erred on the side of massive habitat and nesting site destruction, don't we owe the birds the best chance we can give them? It is the responsible thing to do.

Paula Z
Powell (Central) Ohio


From: Linda [mailto:linyl"at"alltel.net]
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 3:31 PM
Subject: Terracotta birdhouse

Hi, everyone! I don't know if anyone remembers, but I wrote about a month ago that bluebirds had taken up in a terracotta house in the woods with the hole too large and no baffles--just hanging from a tree. The box I had with baffles, post and good location had been abandoned as my husband had backed into the post and rolled the eggs.
Well, I'm happy to report that today, the bluebirds FLEDGED from that terracotta house!! So, thrilling! About 4 and they're fat and cute. You just never know what kind of luck you'll have. But I promise I'm taking down the terracotta house, but does anyone know where I should place the next box for another clutch from these marvelous parents? I have tons of house wrens, but my experience in the past was the bluebirds will fend them off after claiming a box. Will they want that terracotta house? Thanks, Linda in NW GA

When we noticed the bluebirds fledging, we found a chickadee, house wrens, a robin all there cheering them on or maybe they want that terracotta house.


From: Linda [mailto:linyl"at"alltel.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:05 AM
Subject: Cleaning out Eastern Bluebird Box

Especially for Bet and Dottie, I would like to ask why the nesting material was so scant in the Terracotta house that I've written about? I cleaned it out today and there was not much left to clean--some pine needles and a little moss that the Chickadees probably put in first. I'm very curious about how this birdhouse worked. It is cylinder shaped, thick and heavy and does have l l/2 inch hole--thank goodness. I measured it. The top comes to a point where you hang wire. Do you think that the box was very warm and they didn't need much. It also has a drainage hole in the bottom. Maybe this is an ideal birdhouse for bluebirds. I bought it in the mountains of North Ga. as a novelty. A House Sparrow started in the original birdhouse that I have mounted near a pasture, but the House Wren has recently put sticks into the house and I haven't seen the sparrow lately. What do you think about this situation also? The pasture is now full of horses--wasn't when I first put up the house a few years ago. My house is wooded and the little terracotta is there. Nothing seems to bother the house except for House Wrens, but the bluebirds hold their ground with them. Thanks so much for your help! It's nice to know other people who love birding. Linda in NW GA



From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 8:18 AM
Subject: Fw: Cleaning out Eastern Bluebird Box

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
The size and depth of bluebird nests depends mostly on the female but also the floor size and depth of the nestbox. If she is just about to lay an egg when they get driven or frightened from a chosen nestsite where she has already built a nest the female will sometimes lay an egg in the bottom of a clean nestbox nearby.

Some females will build an open bottomed nest consisting only of an outside ring and lay eggs on the bare bottom of the nestbox floor. If the entrance hole is close to the bottom of the nestbox then very often the female will not build the nest taller than the entrance hole but in larger floored, shallow nestboxes if there is room she may actually build the nest in a back corner and have the eggs higher than the entrance hole.

Tell us the size and depth of the terracotta nestbox. You should be able to use a wire and clean out the old nest and re-use this box for this year since the other wood boxes are being visited by wrens and House Sparrows. KK



From: Linda [mailto:linyl"at"alltel.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: Cleaning out Eastern Bluebird Box--additional

Thank you so much, Keith! I noticed the nest was in a ring--not covering
the drain hole. I will send a picture of the house tomorrow. I appreciate
any help. Never had this happen before, as the BB's would always use my nesting boxes. The hole is high enough, as you will see when I send the picture. By the way, the female is very protective of this box. She was irritated when I took it down. I used vinegar and hot water to clean it and
put it right back up. Easy to clean. Linda in NW GA



From: Bet Zimmerman [mailto:ezdz"at"charter.net]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: Cleaning out Eastern Bluebird Box--additional

Hi Linda, I agree with Keith. I've noticed some birds in a hurry/maybe inexperienced/later broods seem to use less nesting material.

I guess limitations of this kind of house would be inability to put a hole restrictor on to keep house sparrows away from chickadees to titmice, if they are a problem in your area (probably not in woods.) Also, sounds kind of tough to clean out and check number of eggs, health of babies, or remove blowflies/do a nest change if necessary. Doesn't sound like it has any ventilation either.

I assume you're not talking about those colonial style ceramic houses sold at Williamsburg that look like a bottle on their side. http://www.nestbox.com/sections/galleries/bluebirds/e_wolfer1.jpg

Bet from CT


From: PTom [mailto:ptom"at"austin.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:26 PM
Subject: Hardie Board for 2nd roofs - and HeatShields

Keith Krider wrote: "I would look for "cement board" or "Hardie Board" and
use this as a second roof over your smaller cypress 1X6" roof board. Get a
contractor with a cement board hand shear to cut the roofs to width."

From construction supervisors* in a new subdivision, I've obtained slats of
"hardie board" siding of various widths.

With a knife and a straight edge, it can be scored to create a clean break -
just like glass.

I use the material to create "HeatShields" (2nd roof and sides, with 1/2"
spacers for airflow; see www.texasbluebirdsociety.org for plans).

(*In my area, home builders prosecute those who pick up "scrap", without
permission, from building sites because they re-use much of what's left
over.)

Pauline Tom
Mountain City (no mountains)


From: RBALTRUNAS"at"cs.com [mailto:RBALTRUNAS"at"cs.com]
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: Hardie Board for 2nd roofs - and HeatShields

In a Message dated 5/30/05 9:03:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ptom"at"austin.rr.com writes:

In my area, home builders prosecute those who pick up "scrap", without permission

I appreciate all the comments on my Cypress. I not only got permission, but the owner helped me start the pile and was glad he didn't have to pay someone to put it in the dumpster. He was also happy to hear my plans for the wood. I also got permission to take 2x6 pine scraps and 3/4" plywood from a dumpster at a different site. With all the construction going on here in Florida and still coming I could probably get enough wood scraps for 1,000 birdhouses. Don't have the time for that many!

One time I asked for some PVC pipe in what looked like a dumpster. The guy in charge did not even return my phone call. So I stayed off the site and touched nothing. Maybe that pipe was not being thrown out. You have to be careful and decent about it.

Ron
Brooksville, FL



From: rob barron [mailto:rebel1956"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:43 PM
Subject: RE: nest box hole size?

Hi Tree,

The synthetic box is an ongoing experiment. The material I used is sold at Lowes as deck planking and is made from recycled plastic jugs and wood fibers. In the deck planking form it has rounded edges, so I ran each edge against the rip fence of my table saw to get a flat surface for tight joints. Other than that, it's just like working with wood, but it doesn't dry out and crack, and it doesn't swell either. It seems to bulge a little around screws if you don't pre-drill the holes. I had to glue several pieces together to make a roof, but all my wood glues bonded it well and made a waterproof seam.

I haven't had good luck with nails and don't use them for anything but keeping the door closed at the top, and even then I use two finishing nails in pre-drilled holes angled downward. I've had better luck with screws for the door hinge than nails.

None of my birds seem to read Sibley's guide or the archives here either.
You're very observant to notice that rough nest box holes don't cause all worn axillaries, but I still use a drum sander on my cordless drill or a sanding disk on my Dremel to round off the edges on my entrances. The birds probably don't care, but it makes me feel like I did a better job. The only perfectly round holes I see in nature are made by carpenter bees, so it only seems natural that cavity nesting birds prefer an oval opening. It doesn't seem to matter if the oval is perfectly straight or not either. I have noticed that if the oval tapers at a slight upward angle it seems easier for the birds to enter the box.

One other possible advantage of the synthetic lumber, other than it being an environmentally sustainable material, is that it is very slick and pretty hard. I've watched squirrels jump on the roof and slide right off. It is pretty heavy material though. You wouldn't want to carry 20 at a time on a trail.

Thanks,
Rob Barron



From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 8:32 AM
Subject: RE: nest box hole size?

Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
Some plastic based boards are not totally stable if you buy them fresh from the factory and there might be miniscule shrinkage. Also when drilling some plastics the entrance hole might not be quite as big as the bit you use as some of these will stretch as you drill them and spring back leaving a smaller hole than what you actually drilled. Normally this does not matter to the birds but machinists routinely have to use a sharp reamer to finish the holes to the correct size if they need them to be EXACTLY right.


From: bluebirdsnbirdfeeders"at"gmail.com [mailto:bluebirdsnbirdfeeders"at"gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: nest box hole size?

Rob,
Was that decking that used called Pro-cell decking? I made one of these houses myself, but then sold it because someone liked it. I used screws, and they worked very well for holding it together. Besides the weight, I think they are a very nice box. If what you are using is Pro-cell decking, this decking material will never warp, weather, or anything of the sort. It will last longer than most people will ever need it too last.

Hope this is helpful

--
Bluebirds 'n Birdfeeders
Daniel Smoker



From: Tree Greenwood [mailto:doctree"at"crosslink.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:36 AM
Subject: Synthetic Box Roofs (was "Re: nest box hole size?")

On Tue 7 Feb 2006 at 23:43, rob barron
<rebel1956"at"comcast.net> wrote, in part:
> ... The synthetic box is an ongoing experiment.
> The material .. is .. deck planking ..made from recycled plastic jugs
> and wood fibers. ...
> ... I had to glue several pieces together to make a roof, but all my
> wood glues bonded it well and made a waterproof seam. ...

Thanks, Rob,

Roofs and floors deteriorate first on/in my nest boxes. Wooden boxes with synthetic roofs make a lot of sense; lighter than the all-synthetic but lasting longer than all-wood, a great compromise.

> One other possible advantage of the synthetic lumber, other than it
> being an environmentally sustainable material, is that it is very
> slick and pretty hard. I've watched squirrels jump on the roof and
> slide right off. ...

That does it. Synthetic roofs next year. I've already finished much of my annual maintenance for this season. Most boxes are in the shop with fresh caulk, cleaned-out vent holes, new wooden roofs or floors, etc.

Thanks again for a great idea,

R J 'Tree' Greenwood
Catlett VA


From: bluebirdsnbirdfeeders"at"gmail.com [mailto:bluebirdsnbirdfeeders"at"gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: Synthetic Box Roofs (was "Re: nest box hole size?")

Hi Rob,
All this decking material and vinly posts, etc., I am very familiar with because I installed vinyl railings and decking for awhile. I make some wren houses out of vinyl 4 x 4's and use Pro-cell decking for the roof. Any comments etc. on them would be very welcomed. ...
Daniel Smoker



From: rob barron [mailto:rebel1956"at"comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: Synthetic Box Roofs (was "Re: nest box hole size?")

Hi Tree,

Just one more comment on synthetic materials. I saw some new colors and dimensions (a thinner, wider plank- I think it was 10") that looked like good roof and floor material. They are also carrying a 6 foot 4 X 4 post with preformed caps. Some are made to slide over a metal post, but one was completely hollow and looked like all you would have to do is saw it into 6"
sections, drill an entrance, put on a cap and floor and you would have an excellent little wren or chickadee house.

Thanks,
Rob Barron


From: Paul & Thelma Montgomery [mailto:pmtm"at"wpcs.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: BLUEBIRD HOUSES

I have a question for anyone......Why will my bluebirds not use an expensive metal bluebird box? It's recommended thru' the Bluebird Society,too.We bought this new from Wal-Marts,3 yrs ago,& there has not been one single solitary bird of any kind use it.Not even a sparrow. I'm bugged by this.
Thelma.

From: bluebirdsnbirdfeeders"at"gmail.com [mailto:bluebirdsnbirdfeeders"at"gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:01 PM
To: Bluebird-l"at"cornell.edu
Subject: Re: BLUEBIRD HOUSES

Could you expound a bit on what you mean by a metal box?

....
Daniel Smoker
1728 W Main St.
Ephrata, PA 17522


From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: BLUEBIRD HOUSES

Thelma,
I have never heard of a metal Bluebird house. Could you describe it for us? What kind of metal is it? Steel? Aluminum? Copper?What does it look like? Does it resemble in shape any of the popular styles? What color is it? How big is the hole? How thick are the walls? Floor? Roof? Is it easily cleanable? Can we find it on the Internet?
How expensive is it? How and where does it open? Is it insulated at all? Who makes and markets this house? Where are you on the continent?
I've heard of Bluebird houses made of all sorts of things, but never metal. I've seen Martin houses made of, I think, thin-walled aluminum, but I didn't like them much. (New England is not a good place to test Martin houses, because there are no more Martins here, I don't think.)

Bruce Burdett, SW NH


From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: BLUEBIRD HOUSES

Nature House Inc. P.O. Box 390, Griggsville, IL. 62340-0390 makes a BBH-1 from about 24 Gauge Aluminum.

The inside floor dimensions are 4"x4" and 6&1/2" from top of floor to bottom of entrance hole. The nestbox is a light tan or buckskin color. The box is a double walled metal with an air space between the two layers of metal and the outside dimension is 5"x5" with over all height of 10" The top flips up for cleaning and is fastened with clips at the back. Roof is 6"x5&1/2" and is embossed bright aluminum finish. It has 3/4" drip ledge around the top and there are 1/4" ventilation holes on all sides near the top. There is a 1/4" gap between the roof and all the sides due to the way it hinges and latches. Drainage holes, about 10 of them and there are 1/4" holes punched under the entrance hole to help swallows climb out of the box I suppose. It comes with NABS House Sparrow Control instruction sheets as well as the Getting Started with Bluebirds; NABS FACT SHEET.

They roll the two layers of metal together at the entrance hole and it is very smooth precisely 1&1/2" diameter round and 3/8" thick at the entrance hole or front thickness.

I was going to do heat testing with this box but it has been laying in the garage with the rest of the collection of nestboxes I have accumulated over the years. Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas

 


Eastern Bluebird Photo by Wendell Long.  Click on photo to go to Wendell Long Photographs website. Eastern Bluebird.  Photo by Wendell Long

HOME - ASO

BEST OF INDEX
  Table of Contents

Articles
BB-L Reference Guide
Bluebird Box, The
  Table of Contents
Bluebird FAQ
Breeding Bird Survey
Bluebirders Pictures
Calls/Songs
Christmas Bird Count
Commercial Sites
Feeding Bluebirds
Forums/Mailing Lists
Gallery
Groups/Resources
Miscellaneous
Monitor Form
Nestbox Info
Personal Sites

First Egg 2000
First Egg 2001
First Egg 2002
Over Winter 2001
Over Winter 2002

Search

BEST OF BLUEBIRD_L CLASSIFIEDS HOME | Audubon Society of Omaha | The Bluebird Box | Bluebird FAQs | Search | Contact me
All material was originally posted on the Bluebird_L or Bluebird mailing list, and has been reposted here with slight modifications to make the posts more readable in an HTML format.  In cases in which quoted material has been deleted to save space, this is indicated by an ellipsis (...)
For more information about Bluebird_L, check out http://www.cit.corn.edu/cit-pubs/email/using-lists/index.htm. If you wish to contact the author of a post, you will need to edit the e-mail address, replacing "at" with the "at" symbol (above the number 2 on your keyboard). (This change was made to discourage spammers.)
If you are the author of a posting and would like to see a particular post (or posts) removed from these web pages, please contact me with the web page address, title of post, and date and time of the post(s), and I will remove whatever material you like.  If you have a different opinion from one posted here, you need not contact me, as often I will have a different opinion too. The intent is to try and provide both sides to the issues facing bluebirders, and to do so in an impartial and objective manner.
If you have problems, encounter broken links (unless they are within an e-mail thread, as I do not maintain those links), or have suggestions on how the site can be improved to make it more useful, please contact the Best of Bluebird-L Classifieds webmaster
Website design by Chimalis